Catch crop strategy and nitrate leaching following grazed grass‐clover
Abstract
Cultivation of grassland presents a high risk of nitrate leaching. This study aimed to determine if leaching could be reduced by growing spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) as a green crop for silage with undersown Italian ryegrass ( Lolium multiflorum Lam.) compared with barley grown to maturity with or without an undersown conventional catch crop of perennial ryegrass ( Lolium perenne L.). All treatments received 0, 60 or 120 kg of ammonium‐N ha −1 in cattle slurry. In spring 2003, two grass‐clover fields (3 and 5 years old, respectively, with different management histories) were ploughed. The effects of the treatments on yield and nitrate leaching were determined in the first year, while the residual effects of the treatments were determined in the second year in a crop of spring barley/perennial ryegrass. Nitrate leaching was estimated in selected treatments using soil water samples from ceramic cups. The experiment showed that compared with treatments without catch crop, green barley/Italian ryegrass reduced leaching by 163–320 kg N ha −1 , corresponding to 95–99%, and the perennial ryegrass reduced leaching to between 34 and 86 kg N ha −1 , corresponding to a reduction of 80 and 66%. Also, in the second growing season, leaching following catch crops was reduced compared with the bare soil treatment. It was concluded that the green barley/Italian ryegrass offers advantages not only for the environment but also for farmers, for whom it provides a fodder high in roughage and avoids the difficulties with clover fatigue increasingly experienced by Danish farmers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In one study, the follow-on crop sequence after grass-clover reduced leaching to 3-9 kg N ha-1, corresponding to 95-99% reduction compared to growing barley without a cover crop and with harvest at full maturity.
“In one study, this follow-on crop sequence after grass-clover reduced leaching to 3-9 kg N ha -1 , corresponding to 95-99% reduction compared to growing barley without a cover crop and with harvest at full maturity (Hansen et al. 2007).”
From Cover crops and optimal N management reduce nitrate leaching to background levels in grass-clover–barley rotations on sandy soil (2026) · cites this paper as Hansen et al. 2007
The efficiency of reducing nitrate leaching following cultivation of a grass-clover ley through the combination of barley whole-crop and undersown Italian ryegrass is consistent with previous studies.
“The efficiency of reducing nitrate leaching following the cultivation of a grass-clover ley through the combination of barley whole-crop and undersown Italian ryegrass is consistent with previous studies.”
From Cover crops and optimal N management reduce nitrate leaching to background levels in grass-clover–barley rotations on sandy soil (2026) · cites this paper as Hansen et al. 2007
The large effect on nitrate leaching is attributed to the vigorous growth of Italian ryegrass after early harvest of the barley.
“The large effect on nitrate leaching is attributed to the vigorous growth of Italian ryegrass after early harvest of the barley (Hansen et al. 2007).”
From Cover crops and optimal N management reduce nitrate leaching to background levels in grass-clover–barley rotations on sandy soil (2026) · cites this paper as Hansen et al. 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nitrogen losses from the soil/plant system: a review
Cameron, K. C., Di, H. J., & Moir, J. L. (2013) · Annals of Applied Biology · doi:10.1111/aab.12014 · Cited by 1,425 · see citing works
Eriksen, J., Askegaard, M., Rasmussen, J., & Søegaard, K. (2015) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.001 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationEriksen, J., Jensen, J. L., Larsen, S. U., Thers, H., & Vogeler, I. (2026) · Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10705-026-10479-z
“The large effect on nitrate leaching is attributed to the vigorous growth of Italian ryegrass after early harvest of the barley (Hansen et al. 2007).”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Hansen, E. M., Eriksen, J., & Vinther, F. P.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Hansen, E. M.
- ORCID
- Eriksen, J.
- Venue
- Soil Use and Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 348-358
- ISSN
- 0266-0032 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2743
- OpenAlex
- W2005837301
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 4.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Use and Management (publishedVersion)
- Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
- Keywords
- catch crops, nitrate leaching, grass-clover, spring barley, Lolium multiflorum, perennial ryegrass, green manure, cattle slurry, ammonia nitrogen, residual effects, soil water
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review