Information for researchers and professionals about the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Analyses controlled for family income, family structure, age, and internalising symptoms at age 11.
“we controlled for the following confounders in our analyses: family income – equivalised fifths; family structure (two vs one parent); and age in years. In an attempt to take account of the potentially cyclical association between social media use and depressed mood we controlled for internalising symptoms”
From Social media use and adolescent mental health: Findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study (2018) · cites this paper as [31]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social media use and adolescent mental health: Findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study
Kelly, Y., Zilanawala, A., Booker, C., & Sacker, A. (2018) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.12.005 · Cited by 740 · see citing works
Working memory and inattentive behaviour in a community sample of children
Lui, M., & Tannock, R. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Functions · doi:10.1186/1744-9081-3-12 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Classi, P., Milton, D., Ward, S., Sarsour, K., & Johnston, J. (2012) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health · doi:10.1186/1753-2000-6-33 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Griffiths, L. J., Dowda, M., Dezateux, C., & Pate, R. (2010) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-7-30 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Behavioral Difficulties, Sleep Problems, and Nighttime Pain in Children with Cerebral Palsy
Horwood, L., Li, P., Mok, E., Oskoui, M., Shevell, M., & Constantin, E. (2019) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103500 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Hoare, E., Werneck, A. O., Stubbs, B., Firth, J., Collins, S., Corder, K., & van Sluijs, E. M. F. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11381 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mortimore, C.
- Corresponding author
- Mortimore, Catherine
- Venue
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 98-98
- ISSN
- 1475-357X (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3588
- OpenAlex
- W2009255289
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 8.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Child and Adolescent Mental Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, screening tool, questionnaire administration, child mental health assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review