Cited by 74Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumInfant Development and Preterm CareInfant Health and Development

Health‐Led Interventions in the Early Years to Enhance Infant and Maternal Mental Health: A Review of Reviews

Barlow, Jane, McMillan, Anita Schrader, Kirkpatrick, Sue, Ghate, Deborah, Barnes, Jacqueline, Smith, Marjorie·2010·Child and Adolescent Mental Health

Abstract

Background: Increasing recognition of the importance of maternal mental health and early parenting in optimising the later mental health of the child has given rise to new ways of working during the perinatal period. Aims: The objective of this review is to identify effective health‐led interventions to support parents, parenting and the parent‐infant relationship during the perinatal period, and beyond. Method: A systematic search of key electronic databases was undertaken to identify secondary and primary sources of data addressing the research question. Twenty‐four reviews addressed the effectiveness of interventions delivered during the postnatal period in promoting closeness and sensitive parenting, infant sensory and perceptual capabilities, and positive parenting, and in addressing infant regulatory problems, maternal mental health problems, and parent‐infant relationship problems. Conclusions: A number of methods of working are recommended as part of a model of progressive‐universalism beginning ante‐natally and continuing through the first two post‐natal years, and beyond. The implications for universal, targeted and specialist healthcare services are explored, alongside the role and contribution of CAMHS practitioners.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-3588.2010.00570.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the review, most of interventions were either home visiting and then by nature PU because they are almost individual care, either a sum of actions targeting the most deprived.

    “In our review, most of interventions were either home visiting and then by nature PU because they are almost individual care, either a sum of actions targeting the most deprived (45,61).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barlow, J., McMillan, A. S., Kirkpatrick, S., Ghate, D., Barnes, J., & Smith, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
  • University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Barlow, Jane
  • McMillan, Anita Schrader
Venue
Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08-12
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
178-185
ISSN
  • 1475-357X (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3588
OpenAlex
W1588405067
Cited by
74
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child and Adolescent Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
maternal mental health, infant mental health, early intervention, postnatal intervention, parental sensitivity, parent-infant relationship, perinatal mental health, child mental health services, universalism, early childhood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review