Cited by 267Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsEvolution and Paleontology StudiesPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology

MACROEVOLUTION AND MACROECOLOGY THROUGH DEEP TIME

BUTTERFIELD, NICHOLAS J.·2007·Palaeontology

Abstract

Abstract: The fossil record documents two mutually exclusive macroevolutionary modes separated by the transitional Ediacaran Period. Despite the early appearance of crown eukaryotes and an at least partially oxygenated atmosphere, the pre‐Ediacaran biosphere was populated almost exclusively by microscopic organisms exhibiting low diversity, no biogeographical partitioning and profound morphological/evolutionary stasis. By contrast, the post‐Ediacaran biosphere is characterized by large diverse organisms, bioprovinciality and conspicuously dynamic macroevolution. The difference can be understood in terms of the unique escalatory coevolution accompanying the early Ediacaran introduction of eumetazoans, followed by their early Cambrian (Tommotian) expansion into the pelagic realm. Eumetazoans reinvented the rules of macroecology through their invention of multitrophic food webs, large body size, life‐history trade‐offs, ecological succession, biogeography, major increases in standing biomass, eukaryote‐dominated phytoplankton and the potential for mass extinction. Both the pre‐Ediacaran and the post‐Ediacaran biospheres were inherently stable, but the former derived from the simplicity of superabundant microbes exposed to essentially static, physical environments, whereas the latter is based on eumetazoan‐induced diversity and dynamic, biological environments. The c . 100‐myr Ediacaran transition (extending to the base of the Tommotian) can be defined on evolutionary criteria, and might usefully be incorporated into the Phanerozoic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2006.00613.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 168 · Cited by 267

Authors
BUTTERFIELD, N. J.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
BUTTERFIELD, NICHOLAS J.
Venue
Palaeontology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
41-55
ISSN
  • 0031-0239 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-4983
OpenAlex
W2131981964
Cited by
267
References
168
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
FWCI
20.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palaeontology (publishedVersion)
  • Department of Earth Sciences EPrints Repository (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Keywords
macroevolution, macroecology, Tommotian, biogeography, ecological succession, life-history trade-offs, standing biomass, mass extinction, Phanerozoic, deep time, evolutionary stasis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review