The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Everyday activism and transitions towards post-capitalist worlds
Abstract
This article aims to broaden and deepen debates on the everyday practices of autonomous activists. To do this we present three main research findings from a recent research project that looked in detail at what we called ‘autonomous geographies’. First, in terms of political identity, we highlight how participants in political projects problematise and go beyond the simple idea of the militant subject, set apart from the everyday who opposes the present condition. Second, we highlight how everyday practices are used to build hoped-for futures in the present, but that this process is experimental, messy and contingent, and necessarily so. Finally, we illuminate the contested spatialities embedded within political activism that are neither locally bounded nor easily transferable to the transnational. This exploration of everyday activism has illuminated that the participants we engaged with express identities, practices and spatial forms that are simultaneously anti-, despite- and post- capitalist. We argue that it is through its everyday rhythms that meaning is given to post-capitalism and it is this reconceptualisation that makes post-capitalist practice mundane, but at the same time also accessible, exciting, feasible and powerful. This paper draws upon material collected during a 30-month empirical research project into the everyday lives of grassroots, non-party political activists in the UK between 2005 and 2008. Three case studies were explored in detail – autonomous social centres, Low Impact Developments, and tenants’ networks resisting gentrification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hegemony and Socialist Strategy
Mouffe, C., & Laclau, E. (1985) · Cited by 12,172
Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics
Gamson, W. A., & Tarrow, S. (1999) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2654187 · Cited by 3,884
SEN, A. (2009) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjnrv7n · Cited by 3,430
Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics
Tarrow, S. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813245 · Cited by 3,268
Gibson, K. (2006) · Cited by 3,056
The New Transnational Activism
Tarrow, S. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791055 · Cited by 2,383
Teaching Community: A Pedagogy of Hope
hooks, B. (2003) · Cited by 2,050
Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age
Melucci, A. (1996) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511520891 · Cited by 1,976
Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography
Harvey, D. (2001) · Cited by 1,705
Culture sits in places: reflections on globalism and subaltern strategies of localization
Escobar, A. (2001) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/s0962-6298(00)00064-0 · Cited by 1,669
Cited by
Resilience for Whom? Emerging Critical Geographies of Socio‐ecological Resilience
Cretney, R. (2014) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/gec3.12154 · Cited by 540
(Un)making in sustainability transformation beyond capitalism
Feola, G., Vincent, O., & Moore, D. (2021) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102290 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Chatterton, P., & Pickerill, J.
- Venue
- Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06-22
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 475-490
- ISSN
- 0020-2754 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1902314391
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 20.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Everyday activism and transitions towards post-capitalist worlds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00396.x
- The paper
- Chatterton, P., & Pickerill, J. (2010). Everyday activism and transitions towards post-capitalist worlds. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00396.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.