Cited by 971Globalization and political ideologiesPublic Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Administration and Political Analysis

“Governance” as a bridge between disciplines: cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy

Open access
van Kersbergen, Kees, van Waarden, Frans·2004·European Journal of Political Research

Abstract

Modern societies have in recent decades seen a destabilization of the traditional governing mechanisms and the advancement of new arrangements of governance. Conspicuously, this has occurred in the private, semi‐private and public spheres, and has involved local, regional, national, transnational and global levels within these spheres. We have witnessed changes in the forms and mechanisms of governance by which institutional and organizational societal sectors and spheres are governed, as well as in the location of governance from where command, administration, management and control of societal institutions and spheres are conducted. We have also seen changes in governing capabilities (i.e., the extent to which societal institutions and spheres can, in fact, be steered), as well as in styles of governance (i.e., the processes of decision making and implementation, including the manner in which the organizations involved relate to each other). These shifts tend to have significant consequences for the governability, accountability, responsiveness and legitimacy of governance institutions. These developments have been generating a new and important research object for political science (including international relations). One of the crucial features of these developments is that they concern a diversity of sectors. In order to get a thorough understanding of ‘shifts in governance’, political science needs, and is also likely to adopt, a much stronger multidisciplinary orientation embracing politics, law, public administration, economics and business administration, as well as sociology, geography and history.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00149.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
van Kersbergen, K., & van Waarden, F.
Venue
European Journal of Political Research
Published
2004-03
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
143-171
ISSN
  • 0304-4130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6765
OpenAlex
W2096536821
Cited by
971
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 64
FWCI
225.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Political Research (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
Keywords
governance, governability, accountability, legitimacy, responsiveness, multidisciplinary research, interdisciplinary research, governance style, transnational governance, global governance, public administration, business management, law and governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review