“Governance” as a bridge between disciplines: cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy
Open accessAbstract
Modern societies have in recent decades seen a destabilization of the traditional governing mechanisms and the advancement of new arrangements of governance. Conspicuously, this has occurred in the private, semi‐private and public spheres, and has involved local, regional, national, transnational and global levels within these spheres. We have witnessed changes in the forms and mechanisms of governance by which institutional and organizational societal sectors and spheres are governed, as well as in the location of governance from where command, administration, management and control of societal institutions and spheres are conducted. We have also seen changes in governing capabilities (i.e., the extent to which societal institutions and spheres can, in fact, be steered), as well as in styles of governance (i.e., the processes of decision making and implementation, including the manner in which the organizations involved relate to each other). These shifts tend to have significant consequences for the governability, accountability, responsiveness and legitimacy of governance institutions. These developments have been generating a new and important research object for political science (including international relations). One of the crucial features of these developments is that they concern a diversity of sectors. In order to get a thorough understanding of ‘shifts in governance’, political science needs, and is also likely to adopt, a much stronger multidisciplinary orientation embracing politics, law, public administration, economics and business administration, as well as sociology, geography and history.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It also confirms Van Kersbergen and Van Waarden's account of governance as a field structured by different institutional forms, policy domains and modes of coordination.
“It also confirms Van Kersbergen and Van Waarden's account of governance as a field structured by different institutional forms, policy domains and modes of coordination (Van Kersbergen and Van Waarden, 2004).”
From Human-centric AI governance in the European Union. Accountability, fundamental rights, and institutional resilience in public administration (2026) · cites this paper as Van Kersbergen and Van Waarden, 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The rise of ‘new’ policy instruments in comparative perspective: has governance eclipsed government?
Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K. W., & Zito, A. (2005) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00540.x · Cited by 714 · see citing works
Good Governance: Concept and Context
Addink, H. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198841159.001.0001 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Beyond explainability: justifiability and contestability of algorithmic decision systems
Henin, C., & Le Métayer, D. (2022) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01251-8 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Hossen, M. A., Netherton, C., Benson, D., Rahman, M. R., & Salehin, M. (2022) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2022.08.028 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Dragomir, A. N., Bulea, I., & Tarnu, L. I. (2026) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2026.1928481 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- van Kersbergen, K., & van Waarden, F.
- Venue
- European Journal of Political Research
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143-171
- ISSN
- 0304-4130 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6765
- OpenAlex
- W2096536821
- Cited by
- 971
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 64
- FWCI
- 225.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.vu.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- European Journal of Political Research (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Globalization and political ideologies
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
- Keywords
- governance, governability, accountability, legitimacy, responsiveness, multidisciplinary research, interdisciplinary research, governance style, transnational governance, global governance, public administration, business management, law and governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review