Cited by 249Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesPsychology and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Delays in Initial Treatment Contact after First Onset of a Mental Disorder

Open access

Abstract

Objective. To examine nationally representative patterns and predictors of delays in contacting a professional after first onset of a mental disorder. Data Sources. The National Comorbidity Survey, a nationally representative survey of 8,098 respondents aged 15–54. Study Design. Cross‐sectional survey. Data Collection. Assessed lifetime DSM‐III‐R mental disorders using a modified version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). Obtained reports on age at onset of disorders and age of first treatment contact with each of six types of professionals (general medical doctors, psychiatrists, other mental health specialists, religious professionals, human services professionals, and alternative treatment professionals). Used Kaplan–Meier (KM) curves to estimate cumulative lifetime probabilities of treatment contact after first onset of a mental disorder. Used survival analysis to study the predictors of delays in making treatment contact. Principal Findings. The vast majority (80.1 percent) of people with a lifetime DSM‐III‐R disorder eventually make treatment contact, although delays average more than a decade. The duration of delay is related to less serious disorders, younger age at onset, and older age at interview. There is no evidence that delay in initial contact with a health care professional is increased by earlier contact with other non–health‐care professionals. Conclusions. Within the limits of recalling lifetime events, it appears that delays in initial treatment contact are an important component of the larger problem of unmet need for mental health care. Interventions are needed to decrease these delays.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00234.x

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, 1993, Depression in Primary Care, 2: Treatment of Major Depression. Clinical Practice Guideline Number 5
  2. American Psychiatric Association, 1997, Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Schizophrenia
  3. Hu T. W., 1991, Ethnic Populations in Public Mental Health, American Journal ofPsychiatry, 81, 1429
  4. Kessler R. C., 2000, The Science of Self‐Report
  5. Lincoln C. V., 1995, Who Cares?, Psychiatric Services, 46, 1166
  6. Research Triangle Institute, 2000, SUDAAN
  7. Rogler L. H., 1993, Help‐Seeking Pathways, American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 554
  8. Ross J., 1993, Social Phobia, Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 54, 5
  9. World Health Organization, 1990, Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), Version 1.0

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–248 of 248

Metadata

Authors
Wang, P. S., Berglund, P. A., Olfson, M., & Kessler, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Philip S.
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02-20
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
393-416
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W2154868042
Cited by
249
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
treatment delay, mental illness, help-seeking, mental health service utilization, unmet mental health needs, age of onset, National Comorbidity Survey
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Health Services Research, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, United States, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review