Cited by 58Academic Writing and PublishingData Visualization and AnalyticsAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Preparing and Presenting Effective Research Posters

Open access
Miller, Jane E.·2007·Health Services Research

Abstract

Objectives. Posters are a common way to present results of a statistical analysis, program evaluation, or other project at professional conferences. Often, researchers fail to recognize the unique nature of the format, which is a hybrid of a published paper and an oral presentation. This methods note demonstrates how to design research posters to convey study objectives, methods, findings, and implications effectively to varied professional audiences. Methods. A review of existing literature on research communication and poster design is used to identify and demonstrate important considerations for poster content and layout. Guidelines on how to write about statistical methods, results, and statistical significance are illustrated with samples of ineffective writing annotated to point out weaknesses, accompanied by concrete examples and explanations of improved presentation. A comparison of the content and format of papers, speeches, and posters is also provided. Findings. Each component of a research poster about a quantitative analysis should be adapted to the audience and format, with complex statistical results translated into simplified charts, tables, and bulleted text to convey findings as part of a clear, focused story line. Conclusions. Effective research posters should be designed around two or three key findings with accompanying handouts and narrative description to supply additional technical detail and encourage dialog with poster viewers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00588.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Beilenson, J. 2004. ''Developing Effective Poster Presentations.'' Gerontology News 32 (9): 6-9.
  2. Briscoe, M. H. 1996. Preparing Scientific Illustrations: A Guide to Better Posters, Presenta- tions, and Publications, 2d edition. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  3. Davis, M. 1997. Scientific Papers and Presentations. New York: Academic Press.
  4. Fink, A. 1995. How to Report on Surveys. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  5. Friedman, G. D. 1990. ''Be Kind to Your Reader.'' American Journal of Epidemiology 132 (4): 591-3.
  6. McDonough, J. 2000. Experiencing Politics: A Legislator's Stories of Government and Health Care. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  7. Miller, J. E. 2005. The Chicago Guide to Writing about Multivariate Analysis. Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing and Publishing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  8. Sorian, R., and T. Baugh. 2002. ''Power of Information: Closing the Gap between Research and Policy.'' Health Affairs 21 (2): 264-73.
  9. Tufte, E. R. 2001. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, 2d edition. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, J. E.
Corresponding author
Miller, Jane E.
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-20
Volume
42
Issue
1p1
Pages
311-328
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W2021396400
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
research posters, poster design, science communication, statistical reporting, poster layout, audience adaptation, statistical significance, program evaluation, conference presentations
MeSH terms
Audiovisual Aids, Communication, Congresses as Topic, Humans, Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review