The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sexual satisfaction in long‐term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction
Abstract
This study examined the validity of the Interpersonal Exchange Model of Sexual Satisfaction (IEMSS) in long‐term, heterosexual sexual relationships. The IEMSS proposes that sexual satisfaction depends on one's levels of rewards and costs in the sexual relationship, one's comparison levels (CL) for rewards/costs, and one's perceptions of the dyadic equality (EQ) of these rewards/costs. Sexual satisfaction is expected to be greater to the extent that, over time, levels of rewards (REW) exceed levels of costs (CST), relative reward levels (CLREW) exceed relative cost levels (CL cst), and interpersonal equality of rewards (EQ rew) and of costs (EQCST) is perceived to exist. Married/cohabiting community volunteers and university alumni/staff completed two questionnaires, 3 months apart. The results obtained from this well‐educated, relationally satisfied sample (N= 143) provided excellent support for the IEMSS. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that each component of the model (REW ‐ CST, CL rew ‐ CL cst, and EQ rew, EQ cst) added to the prediction of sexual satisfaction as expected, accounting for 75% of the variance. Repeated measurement of the IEMSS components offered a better prediction of sexual satisfaction than a one‐time measure alone. Neither gender nor relationship satisfaction interacted with the IEMSS components. However, including relationship satisfaction (but not gender) in the model significantly improved the prediction of sexual satisfaction. It was concluded that the model should be revised to include relationship satisfaction. Both the exchange components of the IEMSS and sexual satisfaction uniquely predicted relationship satisfaction. The IEMSS offers a promising approach for understanding sexual satisfaction and its relationship to relationship satisfaction, as well as for reconciling inconsistent findings in the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction
Brotto, L., Atallah, S., Johnson-Agbakwu, C., Rosenbaum, T., Abdo, C., Byers, E. S., Graham, C., Nobre, P., & Wylie, K. (2016) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.01.019 · Cited by 439
A systematic review of sexual satisfaction
Sánchez-Fuentes, M. D. M., Santos-Iglesias, P., & Sierra, J. C. (2014) · International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology · doi:10.1016/s1697-2600(14)70038-9 · Cited by 434
Relationships among sexual satisfaction, marital quality, and marital instability at midlife.
Yeh, H.-C., Lorenz, F. O., Wickrama, K. A. S., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. (2006) · Journal of Family Psychology · doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.2.339 · Cited by 358
Pornography Use: Who Uses It and How It Is Associated with Couple Outcomes
Poulsen, F. O., Busby, D. M., & Galovan, A. M. (2013) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.648027 · Cited by 285
Sexual satisfaction and sexual self‐disclosure within dating relationships
Byers, E. S., & Demmons, S. (1999) · Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499909551983 · Cited by 277
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- LAWRANCE, K., & BYERS, E. S.
- Venue
- Personal Relationships
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 267-285
- ISSN
- 1350-4126 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6811
- OpenAlex
- W2026757638
- Cited by
- 955
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sexual satisfaction in long‐term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00092.x
- The paper
- LAWRANCE, K., & BYERS, E. S. (1995). Sexual satisfaction in long‐term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00092.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.