Cited by 41Attachment and Relationship DynamicsPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Openness in processing social information among attachment types

GREEN‐HENNESSY, SHARON, REIS, HARRY T.·1998·Personal Relationships

Abstract

Previous empirical and theoretical work suggests differences among attachment types with regard to their openness in perceiving and organizing social information. To examine these hypothesized differences, participants were given two sets of information characterizing the same target person, one set depicting an insecurely attached person, the other portraying a securely attached person. Proposed differences in openness to incorporating new information, differentiation in cognitive representations of others, and recall were assessed. As hypothesized, avoidant individuals were less open to new information than were secure subjects, and they differentiated their representations less than did both secure and anxious‐ambivalent individuals. Moreover, as expected, there were no significant differences between secure and anxious‐ambivalent individuals on the dimensions of openness and differentiation. However, avoidant individuals did not evidence poorer recall of the stimulus material. Theoretical and clinical implications of avoidant individuals’relatively more rigid, simplistic models of others are explored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00182.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GREEN‐HENNESSY, S., & REIS, H. T.
Affiliations
  • Loyola University Maryland (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
GREEN‐HENNESSY, SHARON
Venue
Personal Relationships
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-12
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
449-466
ISSN
  • 1350-4126 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6811
OpenAlex
W2147239849
Cited by
41
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personal Relationships (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
attachment styles, social information processing, attachment avoidance, anxious-ambivalent attachment, secure attachment, cognitive differentiation, social representations, memory retrieval, interpersonal perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review