Openness in processing social information among attachment types
Abstract
Previous empirical and theoretical work suggests differences among attachment types with regard to their openness in perceiving and organizing social information. To examine these hypothesized differences, participants were given two sets of information characterizing the same target person, one set depicting an insecurely attached person, the other portraying a securely attached person. Proposed differences in openness to incorporating new information, differentiation in cognitive representations of others, and recall were assessed. As hypothesized, avoidant individuals were less open to new information than were secure subjects, and they differentiated their representations less than did both secure and anxious‐ambivalent individuals. Moreover, as expected, there were no significant differences between secure and anxious‐ambivalent individuals on the dimensions of openness and differentiation. However, avoidant individuals did not evidence poorer recall of the stimulus material. Theoretical and clinical implications of avoidant individuals’relatively more rigid, simplistic models of others are explored.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Securely attached individuals are cognitively open.
“Securely attached individuals are cognitively open (Green-Hennessy & Reis, 1998;Mikulincer & Arad, 1999)”
From Nostalgia-Evoked Inspiration: Mediating Mechanisms and Motivational Implications (2015) · cites this paper as Green-Hennessy & Reis, 1998
Attachment security underpins inspiration by promoting cognitive openness.
“Attachment security, in turn, underpins inspiration by promoting cognitive openness (Green-Hennessy & Reis, 1998)”
From Nostalgia-Evoked Inspiration: Mediating Mechanisms and Motivational Implications (2015) · cites this paper as Green-Hennessy & Reis, 1998
Social connectedness is associated with cognitive openness.
“Also, social connectedness is associated with cognitive openness: Primed secure attachment styles induce curiosity and cognitive openness (Green-Hennessy & Reis, 1998;Mikulincer & Arad, 1999).”
From Nostalgia-Evoked Inspiration: Mediating Mechanisms and Motivational Implications (2015) · cites this paper as Green-Hennessy & Reis, 1998
Cites
Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511 · Cited by 6,247 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mikulincer, M., Florian, V., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2002) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2002.41309.x · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Nostalgia-Evoked Inspiration: Mediating Mechanisms and Motivational Implications
Stephan, E., Sedikides, C., Wildschut, T., Cheung, W.-Y., Routledge, C., & Arndt, J. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215596985 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Kumashiro, M., & Sedikides, C. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01603.x · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Meaning through attachment: an integrative framework
Dewitte, L., Granqvist, P., & Dezutter, J. (2019) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/0033294118799739 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- GREEN‐HENNESSY, S., & REIS, H. T.
- Affiliations
- Loyola University Maryland (US)
- University of Rochester (US)
- Corresponding author
- GREEN‐HENNESSY, SHARON
- Venue
- Personal Relationships
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 449-466
- ISSN
- 1350-4126 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6811
- OpenAlex
- W2147239849
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personal Relationships (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- attachment styles, social information processing, attachment avoidance, anxious-ambivalent attachment, secure attachment, cognitive differentiation, social representations, memory retrieval, interpersonal perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review