The association of childhood trauma with perceptions of self and the partner in adult romantic relationships
Abstract
In this study, the association of childhood trauma with perceptions of self and the partner was explored. Using a large sample of more than 5,400 couples who completed the RELATE inventory, couples in which neither partner experienced childhood physical abuse were compared on personality and communication scales with couples where only the female experienced abuse, only the male experienced abuse, and both partners experienced abuse. The primary question of interest was to evaluate whether childhood trauma was associated with selection effects of romantic partners, perceptual effects of partners, or reciprocal negativity with partners. The evidence from the analysis of variance and path analysis indicates that trauma is more likely to be associated with perceptual effects than selection effects. Individuals who were traumatized rated both themselves and their partners as more neurotic and conflictual, even when controlling for overall levels of relationship satisfaction. However, the partners of traumatized persons do not consider themselves more neurotic or conflictual than partners in relationships where neither partner was abused.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women and men's CPA were not significantly related to their partner's levels of neuroticism (Busby et al., 2011).
“women and men’s CPA were not significantly related to their partner’s levels of neuroticism (Busby et al., 2011)”
From Partner Effects of Childhood Maltreatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Busby et al., 2011
A person's CPA was not significantly related to their partner's self-reported levels of negative communication (Busby et al., 2011).
“to their partner’s self-reported levels of negative communication (Busby et al., 2011)”
From Partner Effects of Childhood Maltreatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Busby et al., 2011
Cites
Impact of sexual abuse on children: A review and synthesis of recent empirical studies
Kendall-Tackett, K. A., Williams, L. M., & Finkelhor, D. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.164 · Cited by 2,537 · see citing works
Busby, D. M., Christensen, C., Crane, D. R., & Larson, J. H. (1995) · Journal of Marital and Family Therapy · doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00163.x · Cited by 985 · see citing works
The Intergenerational Transmission of Spouse Abuse: A Meta‐Analysis
Stith, S. M., Rosen, K. H., Middleton, K. A., Busch, A. L., Lundeberg, K., & Carlton, R. P. (2000) · Journal of Marriage and Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00640.x · Cited by 691 · see citing works
Childhood abuse and neglect and adult intimate relationships: a prospective study
Colman, R. A., & Widom, C. S. (2004) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2004.02.005 · Cited by 443 · see citing works
A multimodal analysis of personal negativity.
Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.6.1580 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Twaite, J. A., & Rodriguez-Srednicki, O. (2004) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1300/j070v13n01_02 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Partner Effects of Childhood Maltreatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Vaillancourt-Morel, M.-P., Bussières, È.-L., Nolin, M.-C., & Daspe, M.-È. (2024) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/15248380231173427 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“…partner’s self-reported perception of negative marital exchanges (Whisman, 2014), to their partner’s self-reported levels of negative communication (Busby et al., 2011), women and men’s CM was not significantly related to their partner’s self-disclosure and perception of partner disclosure…”
Background
- Authors
- BUSBY, D. M., WALKER, E. C., & HOLMAN, T. B.
- Affiliations
- Brigham Young University (US)
- Corresponding author
- BUSBY, DEAN M.
- ORCID
- BUSBY, DEAN M.
- Venue
- Personal Relationships
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11-24
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 547-561
- ISSN
- 1350-4126 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6811
- OpenAlex
- W1965683284
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Personal Relationships (publishedVersion)
- ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Keywords
- childhood trauma, child physical abuse, romantic relationships, partner perceptions, self-perception, mate choice, relationship conflict, neuroticism, relationship satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review