Cited by 38Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild Abuse and TraumaIntimate Partner and Family Violence

The association of childhood trauma with perceptions of self and the partner in adult romantic relationships

BUSBY, DEAN M., WALKER, ERIC C., HOLMAN, THOMAS B.·2011·Personal Relationships

Abstract

In this study, the association of childhood trauma with perceptions of self and the partner was explored. Using a large sample of more than 5,400 couples who completed the RELATE inventory, couples in which neither partner experienced childhood physical abuse were compared on personality and communication scales with couples where only the female experienced abuse, only the male experienced abuse, and both partners experienced abuse. The primary question of interest was to evaluate whether childhood trauma was associated with selection effects of romantic partners, perceptual effects of partners, or reciprocal negativity with partners. The evidence from the analysis of variance and path analysis indicates that trauma is more likely to be associated with perceptual effects than selection effects. Individuals who were traumatized rated both themselves and their partners as more neurotic and conflictual, even when controlling for overall levels of relationship satisfaction. However, the partners of traumatized persons do not consider themselves more neurotic or conflictual than partners in relationships where neither partner was abused.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01316.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women and men's CPA were not significantly related to their partner's levels of neuroticism (Busby et al., 2011).

    “women and men’s CPA were not significantly related to their partner’s levels of neuroticism (Busby et al., 2011)”

    From Partner Effects of Childhood Maltreatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Busby et al., 2011

  • A person's CPA was not significantly related to their partner's self-reported levels of negative communication (Busby et al., 2011).

    “to their partner’s self-reported levels of negative communication (Busby et al., 2011)”

    From Partner Effects of Childhood Maltreatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Busby et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BUSBY, D. M., WALKER, E. C., & HOLMAN, T. B.
Affiliations
Brigham Young University (US)
Corresponding author
BUSBY, DEAN M.
Venue
Personal Relationships
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-24
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
547-561
ISSN
  • 1350-4126 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6811
OpenAlex
W1965683284
Cited by
38
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personal Relationships (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Keywords
childhood trauma, child physical abuse, romantic relationships, partner perceptions, self-perception, mate choice, relationship conflict, neuroticism, relationship satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review