Cited by 63Gut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disordersPolyamine Metabolism and Applications

HISTAMINE AND 5‐HYDROXYTRYPTAMINE IN THE INTESTINAL TRACT OF GERM‐FREE ANIMALS, ANIMALS HARBOURING ONE MICROBIAL SPECIES AND CONVENTIONAL ANIMALS

Open access
BEAVER, MARGARET H., WOSTMANN, B. S.·1962·British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy

Abstract

Histamine and 5‐hydroxytryptamine were determined in the intestinal tract of germ‐free and conventional rats and mice. Comparable histamine data were collected in Clostridium perfringens mono‐associated rats, while 5‐hydroxytryptamine determinations were extended to include the chicken. In rats and mice harbouring an intestinal microflora, bacterial formation of histamine occurs mainly in the caecum. Compared to values found in germ‐free animals, histamine levels in the wall of the small intestine of the conventional animal tend to be higher, though in the rat the data are not consistent. Mono‐association (harbouring of one microbial species) of germ‐free rats with a histamine‐producing strain of Clostridium perfringens resulted in high histamine concentrations in the caecal contents, but failed to increase the histamine levels in the wall of the small intestine. 5‐Hydroxytryptamine levels in the intestinal wall in the presence of an intestinal flora were generally lower than those in germ‐free animals. Modification of the flora by dietary administration of penicillin to mice partly abolished its depressing effect.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1962.tb01443.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • C. perfringens, a member of the human and rodent microbiota, modulates gut production of 5-HT.

    “Indeed, it has been long appreciated that the bacterial species C. perfringens, a member of the human and rodent microbiota, modulates gut production of 5-HT (Beaver and Wostmann, 1962).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Beaver and Wostmann, 1962

    The paper reports lower intestinal-wall 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) levels in rats and mice with an intestinal flora than in germ-free animals (5-Hydroxytryptamine in the wall of the gastro-intestinal tract; page unavailable). But its C. perfringens mono-association experiment measured histamine, not 5-HT, so it does not establish that this species modulates gut 5-HT production. The passages also do not establish that C. perfringens is a member of the human microbiota. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. DEs PREz, R. M., FALLON, N. & HooK, E. W. (1960). Modification of lethal effect of bacterial endotoxin by substances altering the metabolism of 5-hydroxytryptamine. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N.Y., 107, 529–534.
  2. GILBERT, R. P. (1959). Effect of antihistaminic and antiserotonin drugs on vascular responses to E. coli endotoxin in the cat. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol., N. Y.. 100, 346–349.
  3. GoRDoN, H. A., WAGNER, M. & WosTMANN, B. S. (1957–8). Studies on conventional and germfree chickens treated orally with antibiotics. Antibiotics Ann., ed. WELCH, H., pp. 248–255. New York: Medical Encyclopedia, Inc.
  4. REYNIERS, J. A., TREXLER, P. C., ERVIN, R. F., WAGNER, M., LUCKEY, T. D. & GORDON, H. A. (1949). Lobund Reports No. 2, pp. 1–116. Notre Dame, Ind., U.S.A.: University of Notre Dame.
  5. UDENFRIEND, S., WEISSBACH, H. & BRoDIE, H. (1958). Assay of serotonin and related metabolites, enzymes and drugs. Methods of Biochemical Analysis, Vol. 6, p. 95. New York: Interscience Publishers, Inc.
  6. WAGNER, M. & WosTMANN, B. S. (1958-9). Studies on monocontaminated chickens fed penicillin. Antibiotics Ann., ed. WELsH, H., pp. 1003–1011. New York: Antibiotica, Inc.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BEAVER, M. H., & WOSTMANN, B. S.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1962-12
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
385-393
ISSN
0366-0826 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095169676
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Pharmacology and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Polyamine Metabolism and Applications
Keywords
histamine, serotonin, gut microbiota, germ-free animals, Clostridium perfringens, cecum, small intestine, penicillin, chickens, rats, mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Cecum, Clostridium perfringens, Germ-Free Life, Histamine, Intestine, Small, Intestines, Serotonin, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review