Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

κ‐Opioid agonists produce antinociception after i.v. and i.c.v. but not intrathecal administration in the rat

Open access
Leighton, G.E., Rodriguez, R.E., Hill, R.G., Hughes, J.·1988·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

Nociceptive thresholds to noxious mechanical (paw pressure) and thermal (tail flick) stimuli were recorded in conscious rats. The effects of three selective κ‐opioid receptor agonists on the responses to these stimuli were determined following intravenous, intracerebroventricular or intrathecal administration. Results were compared with those obtained with morphine. Following intravenous administration PD117302, U50488, U69593 and morphine produced steep parallel dose‐response curves indicating antinociceptive activity when evaluated in the paw pressure test. When U50488 and U69593 were tested at a single dose of 3.3 mg kg−1 no effect was seen in the tail flick test. When given by the intrathecal route only morphine was effective at increasing the nociceptive threshold. PD117302, U50488 and U69593 were without effect in either the paw pressure or tail flick tests when tested at doses up to 100 μg per rat. PD117302 caused flaccid paralysis of the hindlimbs following intrathecal administration at the top dose tested. This effect was not reversible by naloxone. All three κ‐opioid receptor agonists produced naloxone‐reversible antinociception in the paw pressure test, and to a lesser extent in the tail flick test, when injected directly into the third cerebral ventricle with the maximum effect occurring between 5 and 10 min after administration and declining back to control levels by 60 min. Morphine had a much slower onset of action with the peak effect being observed 30 min after dosing. It is concluded that, under our experimental conditions in the rat, the antinociceptive effects of κ‐agonists are likely to be operated via an action at a supraspinal rather than a spinal site.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1988.tb10310.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Leighton, G. E., Rodriguez, R. E., Hill, R. G., & Hughes, J.
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1988-03
Volume
93
Issue
3
Pages
553-560
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W2061214727
Cited by
196
References
3
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: κ‐Opioid agonists produce antinociception after i.v. and i.c.v. but not intrathecal administration in the rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1988.tb10310.x
The paper
Leighton, G. E., Rodriguez, R. E., Hill, R. G., & Hughes, J. (1988). κ‐Opioid agonists produce antinociception after i.v. and i.c.v. but not intrathecal administration in the rat. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1988.tb10310.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.