Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A monobromobimane‐based assay to measure the pharmacokinetic profile of reactive sulphide species in blood

Open access
Wintner, Edward A, Deckwerth, Thomas L, Langston, William, Bengtsson, Asa, Leviten, Dina, Hill, Paul, Insko, Michael A, Dumpit, Ronald, VandenEkart, Emily, Toombs, Christopher F, Szabo, Csaba·2010·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

Background and purpose: Hydrogen sulphide (H 2 S) is a labile, endogenous metabolite of cysteine, with multiple biological roles. The development of sulphide‐based therapies for human diseases will benefit from a reliable method of quantifying H 2 S in blood and tissues. Experimental approach: Concentrations of reactive sulphide in saline and freshly drawn whole blood were quantified by reaction with the thio‐specific derivatization agent monobromobimane, followed by reversed‐phase fluorescence HPLC and/or mass spectrometry. In pharmacokinetic studies, male rats were exposed either to intravenous infusions of sodium sulphide or to H 2 S gas inhalation, and levels of available blood sulphide were measured. Levels of dissolved H 2 S/HS‐were concomitantly measured using an amperometric sensor. Key results: Monobromobimane was found to rapidly and quantitatively derivatize sulphide in saline or whole blood to yield the stable small molecule sulphide dibimane. Extraction and quantification of this bis‐bimane derivative were validated via reversed‐phase HPLC separation coupled to fluorescence detection, and also by mass spectrometry. Baseline levels of sulphide in blood were in the range of 0.4–0.9 µM. Intravenous administration of sodium sulphide solution (2–20 mg·kg−1·h−1) or inhalation of H 2 S gas (50–400 ppm) elevated reactive sulphide in blood in a dose‐dependent manner. Each 1 mg·kg−1·h−1 of sodium sulphide infusion into rats was found to be pharmacokinetically equivalent to approximately 30 ppm of H 2 S gas inhalation. Conclusions and implications: The monobromobimane derivatization method is a sensitive and reliable means to measure reactive sulphide species in whole blood. Using this method, we have established a bioequivalence between infused sodium sulphide and inhaled H 2 S gas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00704.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 229

Metadata

Authors
Wintner, E. A., Deckwerth, T. L., Langston, W., Bengtsson, A., Leviten, D., Hill, P., Insko, M. A., Dumpit, R., VandenEkart, E., Toombs, C. F., & Szabo, C.
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05-24
Volume
160
Issue
4
Pages
941-957
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W1584198387
Cited by
229
References
3
FWCI
7.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A monobromobimane‐based assay to measure the pharmacokinetic profile of reactive sulphide species in blood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00704.x
The paper
Wintner, E. A., Deckwerth, T. L., Langston, W., Bengtsson, A., Leviten, D., Hill, P., Insko, M. A., Dumpit, R., VandenEkart, E., Toombs, C. F., & Szabo, C. (2010). A monobromobimane‐based assay to measure the pharmacokinetic profile of reactive sulphide species in blood. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00704.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.