Cited by 1,303Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and Research

The use of animal models in diabetes research

Open access
King, Aileen JF·2012·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

Diabetes is a disease characterized by a relative or absolute lack of insulin, leading to hyperglycaemia. There are two main types of diabetes: type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. Type 1 diabetes is due to an autoimmune destruction of the insulin‐producing pancreatic beta cells, and type 2 diabetes is caused by insulin resistance coupled by a failure of the beta cell to compensate. Animal models for type 1 diabetes range from animals with spontaneously developing autoimmune diabetes to chemical ablation of the pancreatic beta cells. Type 2 diabetes is modelled in both obese and non‐obese animal models with varying degrees of insulin resistance and beta cell failure. This review outlines some of the models currently used in diabetes research. In addition, the use of transgenic and knock‐out mouse models is discussed. Ideally, more than one animal model should be used to represent the diversity seen in human diabetic patients. LINKED ARTICLES: Animal Models This paper is the latest in a series of publications on the use of animal models in pharmacology research. Readers might be interested in the previous papers. Robinson V (2009). Less is more: reducing the reliance on animal models for nausea and vomiting research . Holmes AM, Rudd JA, Tattersall FD, Aziz Q, Andrews PLR (2009). Opportunities for the replacement of animals in the study of nausea and vomiting . Giacomotto J and Ségalat L (2010). High‐throughput screening and small animal models, where are we? McGrath JC, Drummond GB, McLachlan EM, Kilkenny C, Wainwright CL (2010). Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals: the ARRIVE guidelines . Kilkenny C, Browne W, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG (2010). The ARRIVE guidelines . Emerson M (2010). Refinement, reduction and replacement approaches to in vivo cardiovascular research . Berge O‐G (2011). Predictive validity of behavioural animal models for chronic pain . Vickers SP, Jackson HC and Cheetham SC (2011). The utility of animal models to evaluate novel anti‐obesity agents . Percie du Sert N, Holmes AM, Wallis R, Andrews PLR (2012). Predicting the emetic liability of novel chemical entities: a comparative study . The complete series including future publications, as they occur, can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1476‐5381/homepage/animal_models.htm .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01911.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The obesity in Abi3-/- mice induced impairments to systemic glucose regulation, as is typically observed in obese mice.

    “This likely suggests that the obesity in Abi3–/– mice induced impairments to systemic glucose regulation, as is typically observed in obese mice (King, 2012).”
  • The rat is particularly amenable to measurements of cognitive-behavioral, endocrine, muscle, and cardiovascular endpoints, and extensive historical data exist on physiological changes with aging.

    “The rat is particularly amendable to measurements of cognitive-behavioral, endocrine (e.g., glucose tolerance), muscle, and cardiovascular endpoints, and there is extensive historical data on physiological changes with aging [42–46].”

    From Reducing Senescent Cell Burden in Aging and Disease (2020) · cites this paper as [45]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 217 · Cited by 1,303

Authors
King, A. J.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
King, Aileen JF
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05-08
Volume
166
Issue
3
Pages
877-894
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W1492946553
Cited by
1,303
References
217
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 138 · 2020: 124 · 2019: 122 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 91 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 3
FWCI
40.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Pharmacological Society
  • Research Councils UK
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
animal models of diabetes, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance, pancreatic beta cells, autoimmune beta-cell destruction, transgenic mouse model, knockout mouse models, obesity, hyperglycemia, insulin deficiency, ARRIVE guidelines
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dietary Fats, Insulin Resistance, Obesity, Streptozocin, Insulin-Secreting Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review