The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Shooting the Archives: Document Digitization for Historical–Geographical Collaboration 1
Abstract
This article focuses on the practical and methodological dimensions of a somewhat‐neglected aspect of so‐called ‘digital history’: user digitization of historical documents for research projects. Increasing numbers of professional researchers, including historians and historical geographers, are embracing digital technologies as a way to speed research, collect large amounts of primary source material, and enhance their use of this material by mobilizing it from its institutional context. Yet few scholars or information managers have reflected on the implications of this vast, decentralized and idiosyncratic digitization exercise. Debates over digital history have focused mainly on the role and place of archives in the digitization of historical sources or the collection and preservation of digitally created sources, or the merits of the application of new information technologies to historical research. In this short reflection on our own research process, we consider the trend towards self‐digitization of archival sources, and share our practical experiences of document digitization for research and collaborative purposes. We contend that practitioner document digitization opens up exciting new methods for reading and analysing documents, in particular possibilities for enhanced scholarly collaboration.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“At the same time, many (if not most) of the document images used by researchers in real-world scenarios were taken with handheld cameras (often phone cameras), in poor lighting, and with a wide range of clarity, focal lengths, resolutions, and colour profiles (Keeling et al 2011).”
From Unlocking the archives: Using large language models to transcribe handwritten historical documents (2025) · cites this paper as Keeling et al 2011
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Bateman K, 2005, Taking a Byte Out of the Archives: Making Technology Work for You, Perspectives on History, 43
- 10.2307/25095630 · DOI
- Cohen D. J., 2006, Digital History: A Guide to Gathering, Preserving and Presenting the Past on the Web
- 10.5210/fm.v12i11.2029 · DOI
- 10.1525/tph.2004.26.2.7 · DOI
- 10.1002/jhbs.10036 · DOI
- Grafton A, Future Reading: Digitization and its Discontents, The New Yorker
- 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2001.tb00487.x · DOI
- Keeling A, 2000, Relics of the Past: A Methodological Inquiry into an Archival Source, Archives Association of British Columbia Newsletter, 10, 1
- Kurtz M, 2001, Situating Practices: The Archive and the File Cabinet, Historical Geography, 29, 26
- Lazenby Craig B, 2008, Old Myths in New Clothes: Expectations of Archives Users, Archivaria, 45, 118
- 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.09.001 · DOI
- 10.1002/9780470999875.ch5 · DOI
Cited by
Unlocking the archives: Using large language models to transcribe handwritten historical documents
Humphries, M., Leddy, L. C., Downton, Q., Legace, M., McConnell, J., Murray, I., & Spence, E. (2025) · Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History · doi:10.1080/01615440.2025.2500309 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Keeling, A., & Sandlos, J.
- Venue
- History Compass
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 423-432
- ISSN
- 1478-0542
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.