Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 53Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal and fetal healthcareReproductive Health and Contraception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vaginal birth after Caesarean section: an Australian multicentre study

Appleton, Bill, Targett, Christopher, Rasmussen, Michael, Readman, Emma, Sale, Fiona, Permezel, Michael, the VBAC Study Group·2000·Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
DOI 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2000.tb03175.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

SUMMARY: Retrospective analysis of medical records and individual case review was undertaken at 11 major obstetric hospitals for a 5 year period from July 1992 to June 1997 to investigate rates of vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC), the occurrences of uterine rupture, and the outcomes for mother and infant following rupture. Total deliveries were 234,015, of which 21,452 or 9.2% were associated with one or more previous Caesarean sections. Within this scar group, 5419 patients or 25.3% were delivered vaginally. There were 62 cases of significant uterine rupture with no maternal deaths. Perinatal mortality with rupture was 25% and serious maternal complications (usually hysterectomy) occurred in 25% of those with uterine rupture. In women attempting vaginal delivery after a previous lower segment Caesarean section, the uterine rupture rate was estimated at 0.3%, with 0.05% experiencing a perinatal death and 0.05% requiring a hysterectomy. Although VBAC rates in Australia remain lower than many overseas reported series, rates are increasing. While rupture continues to be associated with serious adverse outcomes, the incidence of rupture during trial of labour is low and appears to be associated with a better outcome than rupture of an unscarred uterus.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2000.tb03175.x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Appleton, B., Targett, C., Rasmussen, M., Readman, E., Sale, F., Permezel, M., & the VBAC Study Group
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Rasmussen, Michael
ORCID
Venue
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-02
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
87-91
ISSN
  • 0004-8666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-828X
DOI
10.1111/j.1479-828x.2000.tb03175.x
OpenAlex
W1995644108
Cited by
53
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
5.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 3070 d)
Locations
  • Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
vaginal birth after cesarean, uterine rupture, previous cesarean section, lower segment caesarean section, perinatal mortality, hysterectomy, trial of labor, maternal outcomes
MeSH terms
Australia, Female, Humans, Medical Records, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Retrospective Studies, Uterine Rupture, Vaginal Birth after Cesarean

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.