The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rates of peat formation in relation to degree of humification and local environment, as shown by studies of a raised bog in Deninark
Abstract
In the raised bog Draved Mose, rates of peat formation and degrees of humification were determined in two peat sections. Based on 59 calibrated C‐14 dates, accumulation rates during the last 6500 years of 0.16 to 0.80 mm/year were found. The peat layers were analyscd for Sphagnum species, rhizopods, and pollen and spores. A clear relation between humification degrees and humidity at the time of formation was found, while the relation between measured growth rates and degrees of humification varied throughout the 2.5 m thick peat section. These variations are thought to be mostly a result of autocompaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Van Geel, B. (1978) · Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology · doi:10.1016/0034-6667(78)90040-4 · Cited by 847
Newby, P. E., Killoran, P., Waldorf, M. R., Shuman, B. N., Webb, R. S., & Webb, T. (2000) · Quaternary Research · doi:10.1006/qres.1999.2120 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- AABY, B., & TAUBER, H.
- Venue
- Boreas
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-03
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-17
- ISSN
- 0300-9483 (ISSN-L)
- 1502-3885
- OpenAlex
- W2065843400
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rates of peat formation in relation to degree of humification and local environment, as shown by studies of a raised bog in Deninark. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1502-3885.1975.tb00675.x
- The paper
- AABY, B., & TAUBER, H. (1975). Rates of peat formation in relation to degree of humification and local environment, as shown by studies of a raised bog in Deninark. Boreas. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3885.1975.tb00675.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
