The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The morphology of Opabinia regalis and the reconstruction of the arthropod stem‐group
Abstract
Opabinia regalis Walcott is an enigmatic fossil from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale of uncertain affinities. Recent suggestions place it in a clade with Anomalocaris Whiteaves from the Burgess Shale and Kerygmachela Budd from the Greenlandic Sirius Passet Fauna; these taxa have been interpreted as ‘lobopods’. Consideration of available Opabinia specimens demonstrates that reflective extensions from the axial region, previously thought to be either gut diverticula or musculature, can be accommodated in neither the trunk nor the lateral lobes that arise from it. They must therefore be external structures independent of the lateral lobes. On the basis of their sub-triangular appearance, size and taphonomy, they are considered here to represent lobopod limbs. Some evidence for the existence of terminal claws is also presented. The question of whether Kerygmachela, Opabinia and Anomalocaris constitute a monophyletic or paraphyletic grouping is considered. While they share several characters, most of these are plesiomorphies. Further, Opabinia and Anomalocaris share several arthropod-like characters not possessed by Kerygmachela. It is concluded that these three taxa probably form a paraphyletic grouping at the base of the arthropods. Retention of lobopod-like characters within the group provides important documentation of the lobopod-arthropod transition. A proper understanding of Opabinia and its close relatives, which may include the tardigrades, opens the way for a reconstruction of the arthropod stem-group. This in turn allows the construction of a speculative but satisfying scenario for the evolution of major arthropod features, including the origin of the biramous limb, tergites and arthropod segmentation. ‘Arthropodization’ may thus be seen not to be a single event but a series of adaptive innovations.OPABINIA, ANOMALOCARIS, KERYGMACHELA, Burgess Shale, problematica, Lobopodia, Arthropoda.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Disparity as an evolutionary index: a comparison of Cambrian and Recent arthropods
Wills, M. A., Briggs, D. E. G., & Fortey, R. A. (1994) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s009483730001263x · Cited by 349
Evidence from 12 S Ribosomal RNA Sequences that Onychophorans Are Modified Arthropods
Ballard, J. W. O., Olsen, G. J., Faith, D. P., Odgers, W. A., Rowell, D. M., & Atkinson, P. W. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1455227 · Cited by 248
Cited by
Early animal evolution: emerging views from comparative biology and geology
Knoll, A. H., & Carroll, S. B. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5423.2129 · Cited by 821
Evolution, Discovery, and Interpretations of Arthropod Mushroom Bodies
Strausfeld, N. J., Hansen, L., Li, Y., Gomez, R. S., & Ito, K. (1998) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.5.1.11 · Cited by 579
Peterson, K. J., & Eernisse, D. J. (2001) · Evolution & Development · doi:10.1046/j.1525-142x.2001.003003170.x · Cited by 529
Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence
Zrzavý, J. (1998) · Cladistics · doi:10.1006/clad.1998.0070 · Cited by 438
The Evolution of Organ Systems
Schmidt-Rhaesa, A. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198566687.001.0001 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Budd, G. E.
- Venue
- Lethaia
- Publisher
- Scandinavian University Press
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-14
- ISSN
- 0024-1164 (ISSN-L)
- 1502-3931
- OpenAlex
- W2023906932
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The morphology of Opabinia regalis and the reconstruction of the arthropod stem‐group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1502-3931.1996.tb01831.x
- The paper
- Budd, G. E. (1996). The morphology of Opabinia regalis and the reconstruction of the arthropod stem‐group. Lethaia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3931.1996.tb01831.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.