Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The morphology of Opabinia regalis and the reconstruction of the arthropod stem‐group

Budd, Graham E.·1996·Lethaia

Abstract

Opabinia regalis Walcott is an enigmatic fossil from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale of uncertain affinities. Recent suggestions place it in a clade with Anomalocaris Whiteaves from the Burgess Shale and Kerygmachela Budd from the Greenlandic Sirius Passet Fauna; these taxa have been interpreted as ‘lobopods’. Consideration of available Opabinia specimens demonstrates that reflective extensions from the axial region, previously thought to be either gut diverticula or musculature, can be accommodated in neither the trunk nor the lateral lobes that arise from it. They must therefore be external structures independent of the lateral lobes. On the basis of their sub-triangular appearance, size and taphonomy, they are considered here to represent lobopod limbs. Some evidence for the existence of terminal claws is also presented. The question of whether Kerygmachela, Opabinia and Anomalocaris constitute a monophyletic or paraphyletic grouping is considered. While they share several characters, most of these are plesiomorphies. Further, Opabinia and Anomalocaris share several arthropod-like characters not possessed by Kerygmachela. It is concluded that these three taxa probably form a paraphyletic grouping at the base of the arthropods. Retention of lobopod-like characters within the group provides important documentation of the lobopod-arthropod transition. A proper understanding of Opabinia and its close relatives, which may include the tardigrades, opens the way for a reconstruction of the arthropod stem-group. This in turn allows the construction of a speculative but satisfying scenario for the evolution of major arthropod features, including the origin of the biramous limb, tergites and arthropod segmentation. ‘Arthropodization’ may thus be seen not to be a single event but a series of adaptive innovations.OPABINIA, ANOMALOCARIS, KERYGMACHELA, Burgess Shale, problematica, Lobopodia, Arthropoda.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1502-3931.1996.tb01831.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Budd, G. E.
Venue
Lethaia
Published
1996-03
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 0024-1164 (ISSN-L)
  • 1502-3931
OpenAlex
W2023906932
Cited by
186
References
2
FWCI
13.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The morphology of Opabinia regalis and the reconstruction of the arthropod stem‐group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1502-3931.1996.tb01831.x
The paper
Budd, G. E. (1996). The morphology of Opabinia regalis and the reconstruction of the arthropod stem‐group. Lethaia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3931.1996.tb01831.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.