The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The lifetime prevalence of anabolic-androgenic steroid use and dependence in Americans: Current best estimates
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although various surveys have tracked the prevalence of anabolic-androgenic steroid (AAS) use in American teenagers and young adults, no recent surveys have assessed the lifetime prevalence of AAS use in Americans overall. We therefore analyzed serial youth-survey data to derive estimates of the lifetime prevalence of AAS use in the current American general population. METHODS: We first determined the distribution of age of onset of AAS use, based on pooled data from nine studies. Using this distribution, we then developed equations to project the eventual lifetime prevalence of AAS use among young survey respondents, once they aged and completed the period of risk for initiating AAS. We similarly calculated the denominator of lifetimes of risk for AAS use in the total American population. We next applied these equations to four independent national youth datasets to derive current American general-population estimates for lifetime AAS use. Finally, using data from 10 pooled studies, we estimated the lifetime prevalence of AAS dependence among AAS users. RESULTS: Age-of-onset studies consistently showed that AAS use begins later than most drugs, with only 22% of users (95% confidence interval: 19-25%) starting before age 20. Applying the age-of-onset findings to national youth datasets, we estimated that among Americans currently age 13-50 years, 2.9-4.0 million have used AAS. Within this group, roughly 1 million may have experienced AAS dependence. CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Although subject to various limitations, our estimation techniques suggest a surprisinigly high prevalence of AAS use and dependence among Americans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rich-Edwards, J. W., Kaiser, U. B., Chen, G. L., Manson, J. E., & Goldstein, J. M. (2018) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2017-00246 · Cited by 273
Diagnosis and Management of Anabolic Androgenic Steroid Use
Anawalt, B. D. (2019) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2018-01882 · Cited by 118
Tatem, A. J., Beilan, J., Kovac, J. R., & Lipshultz, L. I. (2020) · The World Journal of Men's Health · doi:10.5534/wjmh.190002 · Cited by 66
Yager, Z., & McLean, S. (2020) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s12887-020-1993-6 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Pope, H. G., Kanayama, G., Athey, A., Ryan, E., Hudson, J. I., & Baggish, A.
- Venue
- The American Journal on Addictions
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-09-20
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 371-377
- ISSN
- 1055-0496 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1512463247
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.