The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cattle Grazing Impacts on Annual Forbs and Vegetation Composition of Mesic Grasslands in California
Abstract
Abstract: Livestock grazing represents a major human alteration of natural disturbance regimes in grasslands throughout the world, and its impacts on plant communities have been highly debated. We investigated the impact of cattle grazing on the California coastal prairie plant community with a focus on native annual forbs, a number of which are of conservation concern. In spring 2000 and 2001, we surveyed the vegetation community composition, vegetation structure, and soil chemical parameters at 25 paired grazed and ungrazed sites over a 670‐km range of the ecosystem. Native annual forb species richness and cover were higher in grazed sites, and this effect was concomitant with decreased vegetation height and litter depth. Soil properties explained less of the variation. Exotic annual grass and forb cover were higher in grazed sites. Native grass cover and species richness did not differ in grazed and ungrazed sites, but cover and species richness of native perennial forbs were higher in ungrazed sites. Our results suggest that cattle grazing may be a valuable management tool with which to conserve native annual forbs in the ecosystem we studied but that grazing differentially affects the various life‐history guilds. Therefore, land managers must focus on creating a matrix of disturbance regimes to maintain the suite of species native to these mesic grasslands. The results of this and other studies highlight the importance of considering the adaptation of vegetation communities to disturbance in making recommendations for grazing management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942661 · Cited by 8,377
Biological Invasions by Exotic Grasses, the Grass/Fire Cycle, and Global Change
D'Antonio, C. M., & Vitousek, P. M. (1992) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.000431 · Cited by 3,399
The Keystone Role of Bison in North American Tallgrass Prairie
Knapp, A. K., Blair, J. M., Briggs, J. M., Collins, S. L., Hartnett, D. C., Johnson, L. C., & Towne, E. G. (1999) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1313492 · Cited by 834
Species richness in a successional grassland: effects of nitrogen enrichment and plant litter
Foster, B. L., & Gross, K. L. (1998) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2593:sriasg]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 501 · cited 4×
“For these reasons, grazing in mesic grasslands may help mitigate the concomitant effects of accumulation of higher levels of biomass, invasion of woody species, and decline of grassland species (Tilman 1993; Foster & Gross 1998; Howe 1999).”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Török, P., Vida, E., Deák, B., Lengyel, S., & Tóthmérész, B. (2011) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-011-9992-4 · Cited by 342
Duniway, M. C., Pfennigwerth, A. A., Fick, S. E., Nauman, T. W., Belnap, J., & Barger, N. N. (2019) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.2650 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- HAYES, G. F., & HOLL, K. D.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1694-1702
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2121368469
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cattle Grazing Impacts on Annual Forbs and Vegetation Composition of Mesic Grasslands in California. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00281.x
- The paper
- HAYES, G. F., & HOLL, K. D. (2003). Cattle Grazing Impacts on Annual Forbs and Vegetation Composition of Mesic Grasslands in California. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00281.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.