The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conservation of the Biodiversity of Brazil's Inland Waters
Open accessAbstract
Abstract: In terms of biodiversity, Brazilian inland waters are of enormous global significance for Algae (25% of the world's species), Porifera (Demospongiae, 33%), Rotifera (25%), Cladocera (Branchiopoda, 20%), and fishes (21%). Threatened freshwater species include 44 species of invertebrates (mostly Porifera) and 134 fishes (mostly Cyprinodontiformes, Rivulidae), primarily distributed in south and southeastern Brazil. Reasons for the declines in biodiversity in Brazilian inland waters include pollution and eutrophication, siltation, impoundments and flood control, fisheries, and species introductions. These problems are more conspicuous in the more‐developed regions. The majority of protected areas in Brazil have been created for terrestrial fauna and flora, but they also protect significant water bodies and wetlands. As a result, although very poorly documented, these areas are of great importance for aquatic species. A major and pressing challenge is the assessment of the freshwater biodiversity in protected areas and surveys to better understand the diversity and geography of freshwater species in Brazil. The concept of umbrella species (e.g., certain migratory fishes) would be beneficial for the protection of aquatic biodiversity and habitats. The conservation and improved management of river corridors and associated floodplains and the maintenance of their hydrological integrity is fundamental to preserving Brazil's freshwater biodiversity and the health of its aquatic resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CHECK LIST OF THE FRESHWATER FISHES OF SOUTH AND CENTRAL AMERICA
Burgess, W. E. (2004) · Copeia · doi:10.1643/ot-04-142 · Cited by 2,344
Global Biodiversity Assessment.
Hengeveld, R., & Heywood, V. H. (1996) · Biodiversity Letters · doi:10.2307/2999726 · Cited by 1,323
Phylogeny and classification of neotropical fishes
Malabarba, L. R., & Malabarba, M. C. (1998) · Cited by 1,318
Check list of the freshwater fishes of South and Central America
dos Reis, R. E., Kullander, S., & Ferraris, C. J. (2003) · Cited by 1,174
Usefulness of the Umbrella Species Concept as a Conservation Tool
ROBERGE, J., & ANGELSTAM, P. (2004) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00450.x · Cited by 1,020
(2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-088449-0.x5001-8 · Cited by 334
Global Biodiversity Assessment.
Myers, N., & Heywood, V. H. (1996) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2261212 · Cited by 217
Buss, D. F., Baptista, D. F., Nessimian, J. L., & Egler, M. (2004) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1023/b:hydr.0000025067.66126.1c · Cited by 204
Hammond, P. (1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2282-5_4 · Cited by 150
Efficiency of fish ladders for neotropical ichthyofauna
Agostinho, Â. A., Gomes, L. C., Fernandez, D. R., & Suzuki, H. I. (2002) · River Research and Applications · doi:10.1002/rra.674 · Cited by 145
Self-citation
Cited by
Floods increase similarity among aquatic habitats in river-floodplain systems
Thomaz, S. M., Bini, L. M., & Bozelli, R. L. (2007) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-006-0285-y · Cited by 848
Self-citationAgostinho, A., Pelicice, F., & Gomes, L. (2008) · Brazilian Journal of Biology · doi:10.1590/s1519-69842008000500019 · Cited by 786
Self-citationFish‐Passage Facilities as Ecological Traps in Large Neotropical Rivers
PELICICE, F. M., & AGOSTINHO, A. A. (2008) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00849.x · Cited by 294
Self-citationProtected areas: A focus on Brazilian freshwater biodiversity
Azevedo‐Santos, V. M., Frederico, R. G., Fagundes, C. K., Pompeu, P. S., Pelicice, F. M., Padial, A. A., Nogueira, M. G., Fearnside, P. M., Lima, L. B., Daga, V. S., et al. (2019) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/ddi.12871 · Cited by 167
Self-citationStream-valley systems of the Brazilian Cerrado: Impact assessment and conservation scheme
Wantzen, K. M., Siqueira, A., Cunha, C. N. D., & Pereira de Sá, M. D. F. (2006) · Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.807 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- AGOSTINHO, A. A., THOMAZ, S. M., & GOMES, L. C.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 646-652
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2092085601
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 11.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conservation of the Biodiversity of Brazil's Inland Waters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00701.x
- The paper
- AGOSTINHO, A. A., THOMAZ, S. M., & GOMES, L. C. (2005). Conservation of the Biodiversity of Brazil's Inland Waters. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00701.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.