The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“A Mission‐Driven Discipline”: the Growth of Conservation Biology
Open accessAbstract
Abstract: Conservation biology emerged in the mid‐1980s, drawing on established disciplines and integrating them in pursuit of a coherent goal: the protection and perpetuation of the Earth's biological diversity. Opportunistic in its borrowing and application of knowledge, conservation biology had its roots within the established biological sciences and resource management disciplines but has continually incorporated insights from the empirical experience of resource managers, from the social sciences and humanities, and from diverse cultural sources. The Society for Conservation Biology (SCB) has represented the field's core constituency, while expanding that constituency in keeping with the field's integrative spirit. Conservation Biology has served as SCB's flagship publication, promoting research, dialog, debate, and application of the field's essential concepts. Over the last 20 years the field, SCB, and the journal have evolved to meet changing conservation needs, to explore gaps in our knowledge base, to incorporate new information from related fields, to build professional capacity, and to provide expanded opportunities for international participation. In turn, the field, SCB, and journal have prompted change in related fields, organizations, and publications. In its dedication to advancing the scientific foundations of biodiversity conservation and placing that science at the service of society in a world whose variety, wildness, and beauty we care for, conservation biology represents both a continuation and radical reconfiguration of the traditional relationship between science and conservation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Towards sustainability in world fisheries.
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Guénette, S., Pitcher, T. J., Sumaila, U. R., Walters, C. J., Watson, R., & Zeller, D. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01017 · Cited by 3,019
(1985) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1310054 · Cited by 1,645
Self-citation
Cited by
Navigating the Space between Research and Implementation in Conservation
Toomey, A. H., Knight, A. T., & Barlow, J. (2017) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12315 · Cited by 329
DIVERSIDAD BIOCULTURAL: INNOVANDO EN INVESTIGACIÓN PARA LA CONSERVACIÓN
Nemogá, G. R. (2016) · Acta Biológica Colombiana · doi:10.15446/abc.v21n1supl.50920 · Cited by 27
A 2026 horizon scan for biodiversity conservation in South Africa
Seymour, C. L., Tolley, K. A., Zengeya, T., Spear, D., Cloete, J. A., Dayaram, A., da Silva, J. M., Alexander, G. J., Handley, K., Joseph, G. S., et al. (2026) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-026-02365-3
Metadata
- Authors
- MEINE, C., SOULÉ, M., & NOSS, R. F.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 631-651
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2053520914
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 33.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.