The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thresholds in Songbird Occurrence in Relation to Landscape Structure
Abstract
Abstract: Theory predicts the occurrence of threshold levels of habitat in landscapes, below which ecological processes change abruptly. Simulation models indicate that below critical thresholds, fragmentation of habitat influences patch occupancy by decreasing colonization rates and increasing rates of local extinction. Uncovering such putative relationships is important for understanding the demography of species and in developing sound conservation strategies. Using segmented logistic regression, we tested for thresholds in occurrence of 15 bird species as a function of the amount of suitable habitat at multiple scales (150–2000‐m radii). Suitable habitat was defined quantitatively based on previously derived, spatially explicit distribution models for each species. The occurrence of 10 out of 15 species was influenced by the amount of habitat at a landscape scale (≥500‐m radius). Of these species all but one were best predicted by threshold models. Six out of nine species exhibited asymptotic thresholds; the effects of habitat loss intensified at low amounts of habitat in a landscape. Landscape thresholds ranged from 8.6% habitat to 28.7% ( = 18.5 ± 2.6%[95% CI]). For two species landscape thresholds coincided with sensitivity to fragmentation; both species were more likely to occur in large patches, but only when the amount of habitat in a landscape was low. This supports the fragmentation threshold hypothesis. Nevertheless, the occurrence of most species appeared to be unaffected by fragmentation, regardless of the amount of habitat present at landscape extents. The thresholds we identified may be useful to managers in establishing conservation targets. Our results indicate that findings of landscape‐scale studies conducted in regions with relatively high proportions of habitat and low fragmentation may not be applicable in regions with low habitat proportions and high fragmentation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000) · doi:10.1002/0471722146 · Cited by 20,302
Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity
Fahrig, L. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419 · Cited by 7,879
Cited by
Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis
Fahrig, L. (2013) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.12130 · Cited by 1,408
Villard, M., & Metzger, J. P. (2014) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12190 · Cited by 403
Spatial models reveal the microclimatic buffering capacity of old-growth forests
Frey, S. J. K., Hadley, A. S., Johnson, S. L., Schulze, M., Jones, J. A., & Betts, M. G. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501392 · Cited by 369
Self-citationHadley, A. S., & Betts, M. G. (2012) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2011.00205.x · Cited by 275
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- BETTS, M. G., FORBES, G. J., & DIAMOND, A. W.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-05-29
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1046-1058
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2099789616
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thresholds in Songbird Occurrence in Relation to Landscape Structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00723.x
- The paper
- BETTS, M. G., FORBES, G. J., & DIAMOND, A. W. (2007). Thresholds in Songbird Occurrence in Relation to Landscape Structure. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00723.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.