Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Engaging Recreational Fishers in Management and Conservation: Global Case Studies

GRANEK, E. F., MADIN, E. M. P., BROWN, M. A., FIGUEIRA, W., CAMERON, D. S., HOGAN, Z., KRISTIANSON, G., De VILLIERS, P., WILLIAMS, J. E., POST, J., ZAHN, S., ARLINGHAUS, R.·2008·Conservation Biology

Abstract

Abstract: Globally, the number of recreational fishers is sizeable and increasing in many countries. Associated with this trend is the potential for negative impacts on fish stocks through exploitation or management measures such as stocking and introduction of non‐native fishes. Nevertheless, recreational fishers can be instrumental in successful fisheries conservation through active involvement in, or initiation of, conservation projects to reduce both direct and external stressors contributing to fishery declines. Understanding fishers' concerns for sustained access to the resource and developing methods for their meaningful participation can have positive impacts on conservation efforts. We examined a suite of case studies that demonstrate successful involvement of recreational fishers in conservation and management activities that span developed and developing countries, temperate and tropical regions, marine and freshwater systems, and open‐ and closed‐access fisheries. To illustrate potential benefits and challenges of involving recreational fishers in fisheries management and conservation, we examined the socioeconomic and ecological contexts of each case study. We devised a conceptual framework for the engagement of recreational fishers that targets particular types of involvement (enforcement, advocacy, conservation, management design [type and location], research, and monitoring) on the basis of degree of stakeholder stewardship, scale of the fishery, and source of impacts (internal or external). These activities can be enhanced by incorporating local knowledge and traditions, taking advantage of leadership and regional networks, and creating collaborations among various stakeholder groups, scientists, and agencies to maximize the probability of recreational fisher involvement and project success.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00977.x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
GRANEK, E. F., MADIN, E. M. P., BROWN, M. A., FIGUEIRA, W., CAMERON, D. S., HOGAN, Z., KRISTIANSON, G., De VILLIERS, P., WILLIAMS, J. E., POST, J., ZAHN, S., & ARLINGHAUS, R.
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09-24
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
1125-1134
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
OpenAlex
W2130553669
Cited by
295
References
23
FWCI
7.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engaging Recreational Fishers in Management and Conservation: Global Case Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00977.x
The paper
GRANEK, E. F., MADIN, E. M. P., BROWN, M. A., FIGUEIRA, W., CAMERON, D. S., HOGAN, Z., KRISTIANSON, G., De VILLIERS, P., WILLIAMS, J. E., POST, J., ZAHN, S., & ARLINGHAUS, R. (2008). Engaging Recreational Fishers in Management and Conservation: Global Case Studies. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00977.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.