Cited by 189Dermatologic Treatments and ResearchFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesSkin Protection and Aging

Review of Fractional Photothermolysis: Treatment Indications and Efficacy

Tierney, Emily P., Kouba, David J., Hanke, William C.·2009·Dermatologic Surgery

Abstract

Background Fractional photothermolysis (FP) is one of the most significant milestones in laser technology and resurfacing. Methods Review of the Medline English literature and recent international conferences regarding FP technology, applications, and indications. Results Successful conditions treated with nonablative FP reported in the literature include acne scarring; dyschromia and fine wrinkling of photoaging on the face, chest, neck, and hands; melasma; poikiloderma of Civatte; nevus of Ota; scars; minocycline hyperpigmentation; telangiectatic matting; residual hemangioma; granuloma annulare; colloid milium; and disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis. An advance in 2007 was the introduction of ablative FP (AFP), which results in significantly greater improvement in skin laxity and textural abnormalities. Most recently, AFP has demonstrated significantly greater improvement than nonablative FP in reducing acne scarring and skin redundancy and laxity associated with photoaging. Conclusions Through the induction of microthermal zones of injury, FP technology stimulates a robust and rapid wound healing response resulting in improvement in a diversity of aesthetic, inflammatory, and preneoplastic skin disorders. Further investigation into the technology and diverse array of cutaneous conditions that can benefit from FP is highly needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01258.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tierney, E. P., Kouba, D. J., & Hanke, W. C.
Affiliations
  • Laser and Skin Surgery Center of Indiana (US)
  • Henry Ford Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Tierney, Emily P.
  • Hanke, William C.
Venue
Dermatologic Surgery
Published
2009-10
Volume
35
Issue
10
Pages
1445-1461
ISSN
1076-0512 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059139443
Cited by
189
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dermatologic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
fractional photothermolysis, non-ablative fractional laser, ablative fractional laser, acne scars, melasma, poikiloderma of Civatte, nevus of Ota, telangiectasia, granuloma annulare, colloid milium, disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis, photoaging, skin laxity, wound healing, skin resurfacing
MeSH terms
Humans, Phototherapy, Skin Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review