Review of Fractional Photothermolysis: Treatment Indications and Efficacy
Abstract
Background Fractional photothermolysis (FP) is one of the most significant milestones in laser technology and resurfacing. Methods Review of the Medline English literature and recent international conferences regarding FP technology, applications, and indications. Results Successful conditions treated with nonablative FP reported in the literature include acne scarring; dyschromia and fine wrinkling of photoaging on the face, chest, neck, and hands; melasma; poikiloderma of Civatte; nevus of Ota; scars; minocycline hyperpigmentation; telangiectatic matting; residual hemangioma; granuloma annulare; colloid milium; and disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis. An advance in 2007 was the introduction of ablative FP (AFP), which results in significantly greater improvement in skin laxity and textural abnormalities. Most recently, AFP has demonstrated significantly greater improvement than nonablative FP in reducing acne scarring and skin redundancy and laxity associated with photoaging. Conclusions Through the induction of microthermal zones of injury, FP technology stimulates a robust and rapid wound healing response resulting in improvement in a diversity of aesthetic, inflammatory, and preneoplastic skin disorders. Further investigation into the technology and diverse array of cutaneous conditions that can benefit from FP is highly needed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lasers create microthermal zones in the skin and stimulate the repair process to promote the synthesis of collagen, thereby achieving the purpose of skin tissue remodeling.
“The lasers create microthermal zones in the skin and stimulate the repair process to promote the synthesis of collagen, thereby achieving the purpose of skin tissue remodeling [2].”
Laser resurfacing technology is a common and effective method to achieve skin rejuvenation through a focal photothermal action, restoring youthful skin.
“Laser resurfacing technology is a common and effective method to achieve skin rejuvenation through a focal photothermal action, restoring youthful skin [2, 3].”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qin, X., Zhai, J., Zhou, C., Wang, Y., Chen, M., Zhu, L., Shi, Q., Chen, W., Zhang, L., Luo, X., et al. (2025) · Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology · doi:10.1111/jocd.70251 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tierney, E. P., Kouba, D. J., & Hanke, W. C.
- Affiliations
- Laser and Skin Surgery Center of Indiana (US)
- Henry Ford Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tierney, Emily P.
- Hanke, William C.
- Venue
- Dermatologic Surgery
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1445-1461
- ISSN
- 1076-0512 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059139443
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Dermatologic Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
- Keywords
- fractional photothermolysis, non-ablative fractional laser, ablative fractional laser, acne scars, melasma, poikiloderma of Civatte, nevus of Ota, telangiectasia, granuloma annulare, colloid milium, disseminated superficial actinic porokeratosis, photoaging, skin laxity, wound healing, skin resurfacing
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Phototherapy, Skin Diseases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review