Cited by 34Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensingWound Healing and TreatmentsPlant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies

Contribution of quorum sensing to the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in pressure ulcer infection in rats

Nakagami, Gojiro, Morohoshi, Tomohiro, Ikeda, Tsukasa, Ohta, Yasunori, Sagara, Hiroshi, Huang, Lijuan, Nagase, Takashi, Sugama, Junko +1 more·2011·Wound Repair and Regeneration

Abstract

The impact of quorum sensing (QS) in in vivo models of infection has been widely investigated, but there are no descriptions for ischemic wound infection. To explore the role of QS in Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the establishment of ischemic wound infection, we challenged a pressure ulcer model in rats with the PAO‐1, PAO‐1 derivatives Δ lasI Δ rhlI and Δ lasR Δ rhlR strains, which cannot induce the virulence factor under QS control, thus the reduced tissue destruction was expended in these mutant strains. However unexpectedly, on postwounding day 3, the inflammatory responses in the three groups were similarly severe and the numbers of bacteria in tissue samples did not differ among the three strains. Biofilm formation was immature in QS‐deficient strains, defined by the absence of dense bacterial aggregates and extracellular polymeric substance, which was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa QS signal, acylated homoserine lactone, was only quantified from wound samples in the PAO‐1 group. The swimming and twitching motilities were significantly enhanced in the Δ lasR Δ rhlR group compared with the PAO‐1 group in vitro. A significantly larger wound area was correlated with the bacterial motility. The inflammation in the early phase of bacterial challenge to wounds with immature biofilm formation in the QS‐deficient strains indicated that the role of QS was more crucial for the chronic phase than for the acute phase of infection. The present findings indicate a difference in the importance of QS in ischemic wound infections compared with other infection models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1524-475x.2010.00653.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 34

Authors
Nakagami, G., Morohoshi, T., Ikeda, T., Ohta, Y., Sagara, H., Huang, L., Nagase, T., Sugama, J., & Sanada, H.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Utsunomiya University (JP)
  • Toranomon Hospital (JP)
  • Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Kanazawa University (JP)
Venue
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
214-222
ISSN
  • 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-475X
OpenAlex
W2142763973
Cited by
34
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wound Repair and Regeneration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22510081)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Keywords
quorum sensing, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, virulence factors, biofilm formation, N-acyl homoserine lactones, bacterial motility, wound inflammation, chronic wound infection
MeSH terms
Animals, Pressure Ulcer, Fibroblasts, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Neutrophils, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas Infections, Skin, Virulence, Rats, Wistar, Biofilms, Rats, Quorum Sensing, Bacterial Load

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review