Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Geodynamic regimes of subduction under an active margin: effects of rheological weakening by fluids and melts

GERYA, T. V., MEILICK, F. I.·2011·Journal of Metamorphic Geology

Abstract

The dynamics of subduction under an active margin are analysed by using a 2D‐coupled petrological–thermomechanical numerical model of an oceanic–continental subduction system. The model includes spontaneous slab bending, dehydration of the subducted crust, aqueous fluid transport, partial melting of both crustal and mantle rocks as well as melt extraction processes resulting in magmatic arc crust growth. Based on our models, the following five geodynamic regimes of subduction, which may potentially form at active margins, are identified: (i) stable subduction with no backarc spreading centre and without plumes in the mantle wedge; (ii) retreating subduction with a focused backarc spreading centre and without plumes; (iii) retreating subduction with distributed intra‐arc extension and trans‐lithospheric sedimentary plumes; (iv) advancing subduction with underplating (laterally extending) sub‐lithospheric plumes; and (v) stable to advancing subduction with stationary (laterally limited) sub‐lithospheric plumes. Transitions between these different regimes are mainly caused by the concurrence of rheological weakening effects of (i) aqueous fluids percolating from the subducting slab into the mantle wedge and (ii) melts propagating from the partially molten areas formed in the mantle wedge towards the surface. The aqueous fluids mainly affect the forearc region. Strong fluid‐related weakening promotes plate decoupling and reduces subduction drag and thus results in stacking of sediments in the accretion prism. In contrast, reduced weakening by fluids results in strong coupling of the plates and leads to advancing collision‐like subduction with enhanced subduction erosion. Thickening of the overriding plate and large sedimentary plumes in the mantle wedge are the consequences. On the other hand, melts, extracted from the hot regions above the slab, rheologically weaken the lithosphere below the arc, which thus controls overriding plate extension and shortening. Strong rheological weakening by melts in combination with weak plate coupling trigger retreating subduction with a pronounced backarc spreading centre. Also, weakening of the continental lithosphere by melts extracted from trans‐lithospheric sedimentary plumes generate a weak channel through which these structures may be emplaced into subarc crust. If there is insufficient melt‐related weakening, plumes cannot ascend but extend horizontally and thus underplate the lithosphere.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1525-1314.2010.00904.x

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Cited by

See all 342

Metadata

Authors
GERYA, T. V., & MEILICK, F. I.
Venue
Journal of Metamorphic Geology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
7-31
ISSN
  • 0263-4929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1314
OpenAlex
W1900130984
Cited by
342
References
71
FWCI
11.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geodynamic regimes of subduction under an active margin: effects of rheological weakening by fluids and melts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1525-1314.2010.00904.x
The paper
GERYA, T. V., & MEILICK, F. I. (2011). Geodynamic regimes of subduction under an active margin: effects of rheological weakening by fluids and melts. Journal of Metamorphic Geology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1314.2010.00904.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.