Report of the Canadian Society of Nephrology Vascular Access Working Group
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis (HD) and is advocated in clinical practice guidelines.
“The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred vascular access for hemodialysis (HD) and is advocated in clinical practice guidelines [1–4].”
From Improving vascular access outcomes: attributes of arteriovenous fistula cannulation success (2016) · cites this paper as [1]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Improving vascular access outcomes: attributes of arteriovenous fistula cannulation success
Harwood, L. E., Wilson, B. M., & Oudshoorn, A. (2016) · Clinical Kidney Journal · doi:10.1093/ckj/sfv158 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Venue
- Seminars in Dialysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-25
- ISSN
- 0894-0959 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-139X
- OpenAlex
- W4253657486
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Seminars in Dialysis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- vascular access, hemodialysis
- MeSH terms
- Canada, Catheters, Indwelling, Equipment Design, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Nephrology, Societies, Medical, Practice Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review