Cited by 54Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Head size constrains forebrain development and evolution in ray‐finned fishes

Striedter, Georg F., Northcutt, R. Glenn·2006·Evolution & Development

Abstract

SUMMARY In ray‐finned fishes, which comprise nearly half of all vertebrate species, the telencephalon does not evaginate, as it does in other vertebrates, but instead everts. No detailed explanation for this species difference has ever been offered. Here we propose that telencephalic eversion evolved because ray‐finned fish embryos are so small that their telencephalon cannot evaginate but must, instead, squeeze into the space just dorsal to the developing nasal epithelia and rostral to the eyes—morphogenetic movements that amount to eversion. Evidence for this hypothesis derives from cladistic analyses, which show that early ray‐finned fishes reduced their adult body size and adopted a novel reproductive strategy, based on the production of myriad minute young. Because body size tends to be inversely proportional to brain:body ratio, this phylogenetic reduction in body size implies that embryonic ray‐finned fishes should have proportionately larger brains than embryos of species whose telencephalons evaginate. This prediction was confirmed by comparing serially sectioned heads of representative ray‐finned and cartilaginous fish embryos at several stages of development. The brain, excluding its ventricles, occupies 36–46% of the cranial cavity in embryonic ray‐finned fishes, but less than 20% in embryonic sharks. Moreover, three‐dimensional reconstructions show that in embryonic ray‐finned fishes the telencephalon has no room for a full‐fledged evagination; instead, it spreads into the spaces just dorsal and caudal to the developing nasal epithelia. These morphogenetic movements, in conjunction with a thinning of the forebrain roof, generate telencephalic eversion.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1525-142x.2006.00091.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The telencephalon of actinopterygian fish develops by eversion of the embryonic telencephalic walls, contrasting with evagination in non-actinopterygian vertebrates.

    “The telencephalon of actinopterygian fish presents a very divergent process of development compared with all other vertebrates, namely the “folding out” or eversion of the embryonic telencephalic walls, that contrast with the “folding in” or evagination that takes place in non-actinopterygian vertebrates [160,161,162,163].”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [163]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.5962/bhl.title.62097 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.2164-0947.1967.tb02269.x · DOI
  3. 10.1053/apmr.2002.33985 · DOI
  4. Bishop S. C., 1943, Handbook of Salamanders; The Salamanders of the United States, of Canada, and of Lower California
  5. Carroll R. L., 1988, Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution
  6. Collette B. B., 2002, Bigelow and Schroeder's Fishes of the Gulf of Maine
  7. 10.1679/aohc.60.329 · DOI
  8. Denison R. H., 1968, Early Devonian lungfishes from Wyoming, Utah and Idaho, Feildiana, 17, 353
  9. Dennett D. C., 1995, Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life
  10. Gage S. P., 1893, The Brain of Diemyctilus Viridescens from Larval to Adult Life and Comparison with the Brain of Amia and Petromyzon, 259
  11. 10.1159/000079117 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90243-0 · DOI
  13. Gould S. J., 1979, The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm, a critique of the adaptationist program, 205, 581
  14. Haller A. V., 1762, Elementa Physiologiae Corporis Humani
  15. Hanken J., 1983, Miniaturization and its effects on cranial morphology in plethodontid salamanders, genus Thorius (Amphibia, Plethodontidae), II. The fate of the brain and sense organs and their role in skull morphogenesis and evolution, 177, 255
  16. Hanken J., 1985, Miniaturization of body size, organismal consequences and evolutionary significance, 24, 501
  17. 10.1002/cne.900340502 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/BF01650031 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/s002270050719 · DOI
  20. Janvier P., 1996, Early Vertebrates, 10.1093/oso/9780198540472.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1006/jtbi.2000.1093 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81476-2 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1002/dvdy.10395 · DOI
  24. Long J. A., 1995, The Rise of Fishes: 500 Million Years of Evolution
  25. Maisey J. G., 1996, Discovering Fossil Fishes
  26. 10.1007/978-1-4684-6465-8 · DOI
  27. Nieuwenhuys R., 1963, The comparative anatomy of the actinopterygian forebrain, J. Hirnforsch., 6, 171
  28. 10.1007/978-3-642-18262-4 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1007/978-1-4613-2988-6_3 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/jmor.1051550205 · DOI
  31. Ridet J.‐M., 1990, Analyse quantitative de l'encéphale des téléostéens, caractéres evolutifs et adaptifs de l'encéphalisation. I. Géneralités et analyse globale, 31, 51
  32. Rosen G. D., 1990, Brain volume estimation from serial section measurements, a comparison of methodologies, 35, 115
  33. 10.1159/000113542 · DOI
  34. Salas C., 2003, Evolution of forebrain and spatial cognition in vertebrates, conservation across diversity, 62, 72
  35. 10.1002/dvdy.10308 · DOI
  36. Sanzo L., 1939, Rarissimi stadi larvali di Teleostei, Arch. Zool. Ital., 26, 121
  37. Scammon R. E., 1911, Normal Plates of the Development of Squalus Acanthias
  38. Schultze H. ‐P., 1996, Devonian Fishes and Plants of Miguisha, Quebec, Canada

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Striedter, G. F., & Northcutt, R. G.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
Corresponding author
Striedter, Georg F.
Venue
Evolution & Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-02-23
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
215-222
ISSN
  • 1520-541X (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-142X
OpenAlex
W2084410567
Cited by
54
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evolution & Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
Actinopterygii, telencephalon, forebrain development, body size reduction, reproductive strategies, nasal epithelium, morphogenetic movements, sharks, Chondrichthyes, brain evolution
MeSH terms
Ambystoma mexicanum, Animals, Catfishes, Biological Evolution, Sharks, Zebrafish, Prosencephalon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review