Cited by 59Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceMigration, Health and TraumaGender, Health, and Social Inequality

Patterns of Coping with Partner Violence: Experiences of Refugee Women in Jordan

Al‐Modallal, Hanan·2012·Public Health Nursing

Abstract

Objective: The relationship between intimate partner violence (IPV) and women's use of negative and positive coping strategies was investigated. Design and Sample: For this cross‐sectional study, a convenience sample of 300 refugee women was recruited from health care centers in three cities in Jordan. Logistic regression adjusted to women's demographic characteristics was used. Results: The study's results revealed that, compared to non victims, victimized women showed a lower tendency to receive psychological support from the family (adjusted OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.29–0.96), to smoke (adjusted OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.09–0.82), to use tranquilizers (adjusted OR = 0.014, 95% CI = 0.00‐0.86), to think of suicide (adjusted OR = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.009–0.15), and to attempt suicidal actions (adjusted OR = 0.02, 95% CI = 0.002–0.19). Conclusions: The study indicated that women's lack of use of negative coping strategies (smoking, use of tranquilizers, suicidal thoughts, and suicidal actions) was promising. However, the lack of use of positive coping strategies (disclosure of abuse, psychological support from friends, and help from family/friends) was somewhat concerning. The role of health care professionals may be helpful in this context. Counseling and support to IPV victims via effective listening, nonjudgmental discussions, and provision of information can be offered by health professionals as part of the treatment in health care centers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2012.01018.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Al‐Modallal, H.
Affiliations
Department of Community and Mental Health Nursing Hashemite University Zarqa Jordan
Venue
Public Health Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-30
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
403-411
ISSN
  • 0737-1209 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1446
OpenAlex
W2046439710
Cited by
59
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
intimate partner violence, refugee women, coping strategies, psychological support, disclosure of abuse, suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, smoking, tranquilizer use, family support, healthcare workers, counseling, Jordan
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Jordan, Middle Aged, Refugees, Smoking, Social Support, Suicide, Attempted, Tranquilizing Agents, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Domestic Violence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review