The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Infantile Hemangiomas: How Common Are They? A Systematic Review of the Medical Literature
Abstract
Abstract: No published prospective studies have been published for several decades examining the incidence of hemangiomas. Older studies were performed before the delineation of “hemangiomas” from other vascular birthmarks was well‐established. The objective of our study is to critically re‐examine the literature reporting the incidence of infantile hemangiomas to determine if the true incidence is actually known. We performed both an electronic database search and hand search of the medical literature on the natural history of hemangiomas in full‐term newborns and infants. A total of seven articles were found comprising two study populations: newborns <2 weeks of age and infants over the age of 2 weeks. All studies included samples sizes >500 patients including both hospital‐based and primary care settings. Study designs ranged from retrospective chart reviews to cross‐sectional cohort studies. Descriptive nomenclature was not uniform between studies, and all had methodologic limitations including problems of definition and study design. Studies estimating the true incidence of infantile hemangiomas are all many decades old and have significant methodologic issues limiting their ability to determine hemangioma incidence. Future studies in primary care settings using the currently accepted classification schema of vascular birthmarks may more accurately define the incidence and potential impact of this common vascular tumor of infancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Consensus Statement on Diagnostic Criteria for PHACE Syndrome
Metry, D., Heyer, G., Hess, C., Garzon, M., Haggstrom, A., Frommelt, P., Adams, D., Siegel, D., Hall, K., Powell, J., et al. (2009) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2009-0082 · Cited by 401
Self-citationMunden, A., Butschek, R., Tom, W. L., Marshall, J. S., Poeltler, D. M., Krohne, S. E., Alió, A. B., Ritter, M., Friedlander, D. F., Catanzarite, V., et al. (2014) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.12804 · Cited by 317
The majority of skin lesions in pediatric primary care attention could be managed by Teledermatology
Giavina Bianchi, M., Santos, A. P., & Cordioli, E. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0225479 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Kilcline, C., & Frieden, I. J.
- Venue
- Pediatric Dermatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 168-173
- ISSN
- 0736-8046 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-1470
- OpenAlex
- W2125087480
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infantile Hemangiomas: How Common Are They? A Systematic Review of the Medical Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1525-1470.2008.00626.x
- The paper
- Kilcline, C., & Frieden, I. J. (2008). Infantile Hemangiomas: How Common Are They? A Systematic Review of the Medical Literature. Pediatric Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1470.2008.00626.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.