The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Habitat Restoration as a Means of Controlling Non‐Native Fish in a Mojave Desert Oasis
Abstract
Non‐native fish generally cause native fish decline, and once non‐natives are established, control or elimination is usually problematic. Because non‐native fish colonization has been greatest in anthropogenically altered habitats, restoring habitat similar to predisturbance conditions may offer a viable means of non‐native fish control. In this investigation we identified habitats favoring native over non‐native fish in a Mojave Desert oasis (Ash Meadows) and used this information to restore one of its major warm water spring systems (Kings Pool Spring). Prior to restoration, native fishes predominated in warm water (25–32°C) stream and spring‐pool habitat, whereas non‐natives predominated in cool water (≤23°C) spring‐pool and marsh/slack water habitat. Native Amargosa pupfish (Cyprinodon nevadensis) and Ash Meadows speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus nevadensis) inhabited significantly faster mean water column velocities (MWCV) and greater total depth (TD) than non‐native Sailfin molly (Poecilia latipinna) and Mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) in warm water stream habitat, and Ash Meadows speckled dace inhabited significantly faster water than non‐natives in cool water stream habitat. Modification of the outflow of Kings Pool Spring from marsh to warm water stream, with MWCV, TD, and temperature favoring native fish, changed the fish composition from predominantly non‐native Sailfin molly and Mosquitofish to predominantly Ash Meadows pupfish. This result supports the hypothesis that restoring spring systems to a semblance of predisturbance conditions would promote recolonization of native fishes and deter non‐native fish invasion and proliferation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Assessing the Effects of Climate Change on Aquatic Invasive Species
RAHEL, F. J., & OLDEN, J. D. (2008) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00950.x · Cited by 1,303
Todesco, M., Pascual, M. A., Owens, G. L., Ostevik, K. L., Moyers, B. T., Hübner, S., Heredia, S. M., Hahn, M. A., Caseys, C., Bock, D. G., et al. (2016) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12367 · Cited by 867
Cook, E. R., Seager, R., Heim, R. R., Vose, R. S., Herweijer, C., & Woodhouse, C. (2010) · Journal of Quaternary Science · doi:10.1002/jqs.1303 · Cited by 549
Transit times—the link between hydrology and water quality at the catchment scale
Hrachowitz, M., Benettin, P., van Breukelen, B. M., Fovet, O., Howden, N. J. K., Ruiz, L., van der Velde, Y., & Wade, A. J. (2016) · WIREs Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1155 · Cited by 346
Collapse of an avifauna: climate change appears to exacerbate habitat loss and degradation
Mac Nally, R., Bennett, A. F., Thomson, J. R., Radford, J. Q., Unmack, G., Horrocks, G., & Vesk, P. A. (2009) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00578.x · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Scoppettone, G. G., Rissler, P. H., Gourley, C., & Martinez, C.
- Venue
- Restoration Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-05-24
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 247-256
- ISSN
- 1061-2971 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-100X
- OpenAlex
- W2022584647
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Habitat Restoration as a Means of Controlling Non‐Native Fish in a Mojave Desert Oasis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1526-100x.2005.00032.x
- The paper
- Scoppettone, G. G., Rissler, P. H., Gourley, C., & Martinez, C. (2005). Habitat Restoration as a Means of Controlling Non‐Native Fish in a Mojave Desert Oasis. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100x.2005.00032.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.