The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Principles of Natural Regeneration of Tropical Dry Forests for Restoration
Open accessAbstract
Tropical dry forests are the most threatened tropical terrestrial ecosystem. However, few studies have been conducted on the natural regeneration necessary to restore these forests. We reviewed the ecology of regeneration of tropical dry forests as a tool to restore disturbed lands. Dry forests are characterized by a relatively high number of tree species with small, dry, wind‐dispersed seeds. Over small scales, wind‐dispersed seeds are better able to colonize degraded areas than vertebrate‐dispersed plants. Small seeds and those with low water content are less susceptible to desiccation, which is a major barrier for establishment in open areas. Seeds are available in the soil in the early rainy season to maximize the time to grow. However, highly variable precipitation and frequent dry spells are important sources of mortality in seeds and seedlings. Collecting seeds at the end of the dry season and planting them when soil has sufficient moisture may increase seedling establishment and reduce the time they are exposed to seed predators. Germination and early establishment in the field are favored in shaded sites, which have milder environment and moister soil than open sites during low rainfall periods. Growth of established seedlings, however, is favored in open areas. Therefore, clipping plants around established seedlings may be a good management option to improve growth and survival. Although dry forests have species either resistant to fire or that benefit from it, frequent fires simplify community species composition. Resprouting ability is a noticeable mechanism of regeneration in dry forests and must be considered for restoration. The approach to dry‐forest restoration should be tailored to this ecosystem instead of merely following approaches developed for moister forests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biological Invasions by Exotic Grasses, the Grass/Fire Cycle, and Global Change
D'Antonio, C. M., & Vitousek, P. M. (1992) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.000431 · Cited by 3,399
Cited by
What's new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly
CRAMER, V, HOBBS, R., & STANDISH, R. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.005 · Cited by 890
Rates of change in tree communities of secondary Neotropical forests following major disturbances
Chazdon, R. L., Letcher, S. G., van Breugel, M., Martínez-Ramos, M., Bongers, F., & Finegan, B. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1990 · Cited by 606
Restoration of dry tropical forests in Central America: A review of pattern and process
Griscom, H. P., & Ashton, M. S. (2011) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.08.027 · Cited by 262
Lebrija‐Trejos, E., Bongers, F., Pérez‐García, E. A., & Meave, J. A. (2008) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2008.00398.x · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- Vieira, D. L. M., & Scariot, A.
- Venue
- Restoration Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-02-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-20
- ISSN
- 1061-2971 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-100X
- OpenAlex
- W2121695396
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principles of Natural Regeneration of Tropical Dry Forests for Restoration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1526-100x.2006.00100.x
- The paper
- Vieira, D. L. M., & Scariot, A. (2006). Principles of Natural Regeneration of Tropical Dry Forests for Restoration. Restoration Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100x.2006.00100.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.