CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 135Migraine and Headache StudiesTemporomandibular Joint DisordersStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Guidelines for Trials of Behavioral Treatments for Recurrent Headache, First Edition: American Headache Society Behavioral Clinical Trials Workgroup

Penzien, Donald B., Andrasik, Frank, Freidenberg, Brian M., Houle, Timothy T., Lake, Alvin E., Lipchik, Gay L., Holroyd, Kenneth A., Lipton, Richard B., McCrory, Douglas C., Nash, Justin M., Nicholson, Robert A., Powers, Scott W., Rains, Jeanetta C., Wittrock, David A.·2005·Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
DOI 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.4502004.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Guidelines for design of clinical trials evaluating behavioral headache treatments were developed to facilitate production of quality research evaluating behavioral therapies for management of primary headache disorders. These guidelines were produced by a Workgroup of headache researchers under auspices of the American Headache Society. The guidelines are complementary to and modeled after guidelines for pharmacological trials published by the International Headache Society, but they address methodologic considerations unique to behavioral and other nonpharmacological treatments. Explicit guidelines for evaluating behavioral headache therapies are needed as the optimal methodology for behavioral (and other nonpharmacologic) trials necessarily differs from the preferred methodology for drug trials. In addition, trials comparing and integrating drug and behavioral therapies present methodological challenges not addressed by guidelines for pharmacologic research. These guidelines address patient selection, trial design for behavioral treatments and for comparisons across multiple treatment modalities (eg, behavioral vs pharmacologic), evaluation of results, and research ethics. Although developed specifically for behavioral therapies, the guidelines may apply to the design of clinical trials evaluating many forms of nonpharmacologic therapies for headache.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.4502004.x

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 100 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Penzien DB, The Headaches
  2. Holroyd KA, 1982, Stress Prevention and Management: A Cognitive‐Behavioral Approach, 219
  3. 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041007646.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Lipchik GL, 2004, Seminars in Pain Medicine: Headache, 93
  5. Penzien DB, The Headaches
  6. 10.1111/j.1468-2982.1998.1807455.x · DOI
  7. Temple RJ, 2002, The Science of the Placebo: Toward an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda, 209
  8. 10.1037//0022-006X.58.2.216 · DOI
  9. 10.1037//0022-006X.58.2.210 · DOI
  10. Holroyd K, 1993, Headache Diagnosis and Interdisciplinary Treatment, 309
  11. Hollon SD, 1999, Psychiatry in the New Millenium
  12. Klein D, 1999, Psychiatry in the New Millenium
  13. Klein D, 1999, Psychiatry in the New Millenium
  14. Califf RM, 2002, The Science of the Placebo: Toward an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda, 249
  15. Feigal DW, 2002, The Science of the Placebo: Toward an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda, 300
  16. Rothman KJ, 2002, The Science of the Placebo: Toward an Interdisciplinary Research Agenda, 227
  17. Penzien DB, 1994, Interrelationships among daily and global self‐report measures of headache, Headache Q, 5, 8
  18. 10.1037/0003-066X.57.12.1060 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–135 of 135

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Penzien, D. B., Andrasik, F., Freidenberg, B. M., Houle, T. T., Lake, A. E., Lipchik, G. L., Holroyd, K. A., Lipton, R. B., McCrory, D. C., Nash, J. M., Nicholson, R. A., Powers, S. W., Rains, J. C., & Wittrock, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Mississippi (US)
ORCID
Venue
Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-05
Volume
45
Issue
s2
Pages
S110-32
ISSN
  • 0017-8748 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4610
DOI
10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.4502004.x
OpenAlex
W2142405574
Cited by
135
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 24 d)
Locations
  • Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
recurrent headache, clinical trial design, primary headache, non-pharmacological treatment, patient selection, research ethics
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Recurrence, Research Design, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Patient Selection, Headache Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review