Cited by 73Migraine and Headache StudiesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationTemporomandibular Joint Disorders

Predictors of Disability in Migraineurs Referred to a Tertiary Clinic: Neck Pain, Headache Characteristics, and Coping Behaviors

Ford, Sutapa, Calhoun, Anne, Kahn, Kevin, Mann, John, Finkel, Alan·2008·Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain

Abstract

Objective The aim of this retrospective study was to determine if neck pain, select headache characteristics, and migraine-related coping response predicted disability in migraineurs referred to a tertiary headache clinic. Methods Patients seeking treatment at a neurology-based headache clinic were included if they met diagnostic criteria for migraine with or without aura according to the International Headache Society (1.1, 1.2). Subjects completed a self-report headache history form and a detailed headache and neurologic examination. The headache history form assessed: 1)weekly headache frequency; 2) number of weekly severe headaches; 3) presence of migraine-related neck pain; 4) photophobia; 5) phonophobia; 6) headache duration; 7) vomiting; 8) monthly headache-free days; and 9) behavioral coping style. Disability was assessed using a self-report inventory (HIT-6). Results Self-reported headache severity, frequency, and headache-free days were strongly associated with disability. The presence of neck pain during migraine and one's coping response to migraine significantly predicted disability independent of headache characteristics. Conclusions These data suggest the need for prospective research exploring the causal mechanisms by which neck pain and coping response influence disability and underscores the importance of multidisciplinary approaches to headache management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.00859.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ford, S., Calhoun, A., Kahn, K., Mann, J., & Finkel, A.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03-28
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
523-528
ISSN
  • 0017-8748 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-4610
OpenAlex
W2062438892
Cited by
73
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Keywords
migraine, disability, neck pain, headache characteristics, coping styles, headache severity, headache frequency, photophobia, phonophobia, HIT-6, migraine with or without aura
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Migraine Disorders, Nausea, Retrospective Studies, Pain Clinics, Neck Pain, Photophobia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review