Cited by 151Medication Adherence and ComplianceBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesPharmacy and Medical Practices

Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy With Fixed‐Dose Amlodipine Besylate/Benazepril HCl Versus Comparable Component‐Based Therapy

Taylor, Addison A., Shoheiber, Omar·2003·Congestive Heart Failure

Abstract

Adhering to medication regimens has the potential to significantly improve clinical outcomes for persons with high blood pressure. A patient-related factor likely to affect adherence to treatment is the convenience of the prescribed drug regimen. The authors hypothesized that medication adherence would be superior and cost benefits would accrue in subjects who receive a once-daily, single-capsule, fixed-dose combination product for blood pressure control, compared with subjects who receive a similar regimen of separate components. A managed care organization that provides benefits for members enrolled in various health plans provided the data for this retrospective analysis. The database was used to assess medication adherence patterns for two groups of hypertensive subjects. Group 1 included subjects who had been prescribed the single-capsule, fixed-dose combination of amlodipine besylate/benazepril HCl. Group 2 comprised subjects who had been prescribed a regimen including an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker as separate drugs. Adherence was measured by the medication possession ratio, and medical resource utilization by the two groups was assessed during the study period. Group 1 (n=2754) and Group 2 (n=2978) were balanced with regard to age (mean, 53 years; range, 18-64 years) and sex (men, 50%; women, 50%). The overall medication possession ratio for Group 1 was significantly higher than that for Group 2 (80.8% vs. 73.8…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1527-5299.2003.03269.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, A. A., & Shoheiber, O.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Addison A.
Venue
Congestive Heart Failure
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-11
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
324-332
ISSN
  • 1527-5299 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7133
OpenAlex
W1988164721
Cited by
151
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Congestive Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
medication adherence, fixed-dose combination, hypertension, ACE inhibitors, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, medication possession ratio, medical resource utilization, once-daily dosing, managed care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Antihypertensive Agents, Benzazepines, Calcium Channel Blockers, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Amlodipine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review