Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of a Humanized In Vitro Blood–Brain Barrier Model to Screen for Brain Penetration of Antiepileptic Drugs

Cucullo, Luca, Hossain, Mohammed, Rapp, Ed, Manders, Toby, Marchi, Nicola, Janigro, Damir·2007·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: Purpose:A biotechnologic breakthrough for the study of drug permeability across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) would be the use of a reproducible in vitro model that recapitulates the functional, structural, and pathologic properties of the BBB in situ. We developed a humanized dynamic in vitro BBB model (DIV‐BBB) based on cocultures of human microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs) from “normal” and drug‐resistant epileptic brain tissue with human brain astrocytes (HAs) from epilepsy patients or controls. Methods:HBMECs and HAs were cocultured for 28 days in polypropylene capillaries. HBMECs were exposed to physiologic levels of shear stress generated by intraluminal flow. Permeability to [3 H]sucrose, [14 C]phenytoin, and [14 C]diazepam was measured in control and drug‐resistant DIV‐BBB with and without pretreatment with the MDR1 inhibitor XR9576. BBB integrity was monitored by transendothelial electrical resistance measurements (TEERs). Cell growth and viability were assessed by measurement of glucose consumption and lactate production. Results:P Sucrose and TEER values did not depend on the origin of the endothelium used (epileptic or normal). P Phenytoin was 10‐fold less (1.54 × 10−6 cm/s) in drug‐resistant BBB models than in controls (1.74 × 10−5 cm/s). MDR1 blockade with XR9576 was effective (3.5‐fold increase) only in drug‐resistant cultures. P Diazepam in control and drug‐resistant DIV‐BBB was not affected by XR9576 and did not depend on the epileptic or control origin of endothelia. The overall contribution of epileptic glia to pharmacoresistance was negligible. Conclusions:These results show that, for the substances used, the humanized DIV‐BBB recapitulates the physiologic permeability properties of the BBB in vivo and is also capable of mimicking a drug‐resistant BBB phenotype.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00960.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Cucullo, L., Hossain, M., Rapp, E., Manders, T., Marchi, N., & Janigro, D.
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
505-516
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W2073313174
Cited by
162
References
1
FWCI
6.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a Humanized In Vitro Blood–Brain Barrier Model to Screen for Brain Penetration of Antiepileptic Drugs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00960.x
The paper
Cucullo, L., Hossain, M., Rapp, E., Manders, T., Marchi, N., & Janigro, D. (2007). Development of a Humanized In Vitro Blood–Brain Barrier Model to Screen for Brain Penetration of Antiepileptic Drugs. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00960.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.