The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy in children: More to VNS than seizure frequency reduction
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Purpose: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is used increasingly as adjunctive therapy for refractory epilepsy. Studies of VNS in children report mainly seizure frequency reduction as a measure of efficacy and clinical details are often scanty. We report our experience with VNS in children with refractory epilepsy and emphasize the positive effects of VNS in terms of seizure severity. Methods: We reviewed 26 consecutive children who had VNS with a minimum follow‐up period of 18 months. We examined their clinical characteristics, seizure types, seizure frequency, epilepsy syndrome diagnosis, and response to VNS in terms of seizure frequency and seizure severity. Results: Fifty‐four percent of patients responded to VNS with ≥50% seizure frequency reduction. Patients with Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and tonic seizures had a higher responder rate; 78% (seven of nine patients) (p < 0.01). Status epilepticus (SE) episodes were reduced or ceased in the four patients with recurrent SE. Seizure severity, duration, and recovery time decreased in all responders. Increased alertness was reported in all responders and three nonresponders. Conclusion: Decreased seizure severity, recovery time, abolition of daytime drop attacks, and reduced hospitalization due to SE improved patients’ lives over and above the benefit from seizure frequency reduction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ben‐Menachem, E., Mañon‐Espaillat, R., Ristanovic, R., Wilder, B. J., Stefan, H., Mirza, W., Tarver, W. B., Wernicke, J. F., & First International Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group (1994) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb02482.x · Cited by 683
Cited by
Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Status Epilepticus
Neurocritical Care Society Status Epilepticus Guideline Writing Committee, Brophy, G. M., Bell, R., Claassen, J., Alldredge, B., Bleck, T. P., Glauser, T., LaRoche, S. M., Riviello, J. J., Shutter, L., et al. (2012) · Neurocritical Care · doi:10.1007/s12028-012-9695-z · Cited by 1,623
Morris, G. L., Gloss, D., Buchhalter, J., Mack, K. J., Nickels, K., & Harden, C. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182a393d1 · Cited by 450
Wilmshurst, J. M., Gaillard, W. D., Vinayan, K. P., Tsuchida, T. N., Plouin, P., Van Bogaert, P., Carrizosa, J., Elia, M., Craiu, D., Jovic, N. J., et al. (2015) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.13057 · Cited by 418
George, M. S., & Aston-Jones, G. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.87 · Cited by 401
Rates and Predictors of Seizure Freedom With Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Intractable Epilepsy
Englot, D. J., Rolston, J. D., Wright, C. W., Hassnain, K. H., & Chang, E. F. (2016) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000001165 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Shahwan, A., Bailey, C., Maxiner, W., & Harvey, A. S.
- Venue
- Epilepsia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1220-1228
- ISSN
- 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-1167
- OpenAlex
- W2049157075
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy in children: More to VNS than seizure frequency reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01940.x
- The paper
- Shahwan, A., Bailey, C., Maxiner, W., & Harvey, A. S. (2009). Vagus nerve stimulation for refractory epilepsy in children: More to VNS than seizure frequency reduction. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01940.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.