The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lacosamide as adjunctive therapy for partial‐onset seizures: A randomized controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide (400 and 600 mg/day) as adjunctive treatment in patients with uncontrolled partial‐onset seizures taking one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Methods: This multicenter, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial randomized patients 1:2:1 to placebo, lacosamide 400 mg, or lacosamide 600 mg/day. After an 8‐week baseline period, patients began treatment with placebo or lacosamide 100 mg/day, were force‐titrated weekly (100 mg/day increments) to the target dose, and entered a 12‐week maintenance period. Results: A total of 405 patients were randomized and received trial medication. Most (82.1%) were taking two to three concomitant AEDs. Median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline to maintenance (intention‐to‐treat, ITT) were 37.3% for lacosamide 400 mg/day (p = 0.008) and 37.8% for lacosamide 600 mg/day (p = 0.006) compared to 20.8% for placebo, with responder rates of 38.3% and 41.2%, respectively, compared to placebo (18.3%, p < 0.001; ITT). Patients randomized to lacosamide showed large reductions in secondarily generalized tonic–clonic seizures, with median percent reductions in seizure frequency of 59.4% for lacosamide 400 mg/day and 93.0% for lacosamide 600 mg/day compared to 14.3% for placebo, and responder rates of 56.0% and 70.2% compared to placebo (33.3%). Dose‐related adverse events included dizziness, nausea, and vomiting. Discussion: Adjunctive treatment with lacosamide 400 and 600 mg/day reduced seizure frequency for patients with uncontrolled partial‐onset seizures. Lacosamide 400 mg/day provided a good balance of efficacy and tolerability; lacosamide 600 mg/day may provide additional benefit for some patients as suggested by secondary efficacy analyses, including response in patients with secondarily generalized tonic–clonic seizures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mortality of Epilepsy in Developed Countries: A Review
Forsgren, L., Hauser, W. A., Olafsson, E., Sander, J. W. A. S., Sillanpää, M., & Tomson, T. (2005) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.00403.x · Cited by 282
Cited by
Biton, V., Berkovic, S. F., Abou‐Khalil, B., Sperling, M. R., Johnson, M. E., & Lu, S. (2014) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.12433 · Cited by 253
Self-citationA review of the pharmacology and clinical efficacy of brivaracetam
Klein, P., Diaz, A., Gasalla, T., & Whitesides, J. (2018) · Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications · doi:10.2147/cpaa.s114072 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Chung, S., Sperling, M. R., Biton, V., Krauss, G., Hebert, D., Rudd, G. D., Doty, P., & on behalf of the SP754 Study Group
- Venue
- Epilepsia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 958-967
- ISSN
- 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-1167
- OpenAlex
- W1857985470
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lacosamide as adjunctive therapy for partial‐onset seizures: A randomized controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02496.x
- The paper
- Chung, S., Sperling, M. R., Biton, V., Krauss, G., Hebert, D., Rudd, G. D., Doty, P., & on behalf of the SP754 Study Group. (2010). Lacosamide as adjunctive therapy for partial‐onset seizures: A randomized controlled trial. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02496.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.