The DOI matches its Crossref record.
BACTERIA INDUCED POLYMORPHISM IN AN AXENIC LABORATORY STRAIN OF ULVA LACTUCA (CHLOROPHYCEAE)1
Abstract
A laboratory culture of Ulva lactuca L. purified with antibiotics in 1958 can assume different morphologies. In synthetic media of the ASP type it grows as a pin‐cushion composed of uniseriate branching filaments. Only occasionally some finger‐like germlings appear which, after a few millimeters growth, disintegrate and originate the branched uniseriate filaments. Many strains of marine bacteria, isolated from Ulva and other seaweeds collected in nature or from laboratory cultures, when grown together with this axenic Ulva, induced growth of long thin Enteromorpha‐like tubes (active bacteria). Other bacterial strains have no visible morphological effect on the Ulva (inactive). Combinations of several active and inactive bacterial strains result in flat ribbons which can be wide or narrow and with distromatic portions intercalated between tubular portions. No combination has so far induced the axenic Ulva to produce the typical expanded foliose thallus. Bacterial filtrates are inactive; syntrophic growth seems indispensable. The bacterial strains lose the ability to induce morphogenic effects on the axenic Ulva when grown for several transfers in organic marine media and regain it by growing with Ulva for several transfers in synthetic mineral media. Each partner appears therefore to be dependent on the metabolites produced by the other. The perpetuation of a wide morphological versatility of this laboratory strain of Ulva after 15 yr maintenance under under artificial conditions emphasizes the phylogenetic importance of this versatility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Structure and Functional Properties of Ulvan, a Polysaccharide from Green Seaweeds
Lahaye, M., & Robic, A. (2007) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm061185q · Cited by 1,019
The seaweed holobiont: understanding seaweed–bacteria interactions
Egan, S., Harder, T., Burke, C., Steinberg, P., Kjelleberg, S., & Thomas, T. (2013) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12011 · Cited by 707
Quorum sensing, communication and cross-kingdom signalling in the bacterial world
Williams, P. (2007) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/mic.0.2007/012856-0 · Cited by 648
Linnaeus was right all along:Ulva and Enteromorpha are not distinct genera
Hayden, H. S., Blomster, J., Maggs, C. A., Silva, P. C., Stanhope, M. J., & Waaland, J. R. (2003) · European Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1080/1364253031000136321 · Cited by 585
Alegado, R. A., Brown, L. W., Cao, S., Dermenjian, R. K., Zuzow, R., Fairclough, S. R., Clardy, J., & King, N. (2012) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.00013 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- Provasoli, L., & Pintner, I. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Phycology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1980-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 196-201
- ISSN
- 0022-3646 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-8817
- OpenAlex
- W2151253998
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BACTERIA INDUCED POLYMORPHISM IN AN AXENIC LABORATORY STRAIN OF ULVA LACTUCA (CHLOROPHYCEAE)1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1529-8817.1980.tb03019.x
- The paper
- Provasoli, L., & Pintner, I. J. (1980). BACTERIA INDUCED POLYMORPHISM IN AN AXENIC LABORATORY STRAIN OF ULVA LACTUCA (CHLOROPHYCEAE)1. Journal of Phycology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.1980.tb03019.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.