The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Empirical Analysis of the Strategic Use of Corporate Social Responsibility
Abstract
Recent theories of the strategic use of corporate social responsibility (CSR) emphasize the role of information asymmetry and how CSR is likely to be incorporated into a firm's product differentiation strategy. A key empirical implication of these theories is that firms selling experience or credence goods are more likely to be socially responsible than firms selling search goods. Using firm‐level data, we report evidence that is consistent with this hypothesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
Cited by
The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value: The Role of Customer Awareness
Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1630 · Cited by 2,534
Corporate Sustainability: First Evidence on Materiality
Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-51383 · Cited by 1,959
Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility
Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.50.1.51 · Cited by 1,116
Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany
Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011) · Review of Managerial Science · doi:10.1007/s11846-010-0052-3 · Cited by 926
Stahl, G. K., Brewster, C. J., Collings, D. G., & Hajro, A. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100708 · Cited by 502
Metadata
- Authors
- Siegel, D. S., & Vitaliano, D. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Economics & Management Strategy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07-26
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 773-792
- ISSN
- 1058-6407 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9134
- OpenAlex
- W2024496989
- Cited by
- 696
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 52.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
