The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analyzing Drivers of Regional Carbon Dioxide Emissions for China: A Structural Decomposition Analysis
Abstract
Summary: China faces the challenge of balancing unprecedented economic growth and environmental sustainability. Rather than a homogenous country that can be analyzed at the national level, China is a vast country with significant regional differences in physical geography, regional economy, demographics, industry structure, and household consumption patterns. There are pronounced differences between the much‐developed Eastern‐Coastal economic zone and the less developed Central and Western economic zones in China. Such variations lead to large regional discrepancies in carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions. Using the 28 regional input‐output tables of China for 2002 and 2007 and structural decomposition analysis (SDA), we analyze how changes in population, technology, economic structure, urbanization, and household consumption patterns drive regional CO 2 emissions. The results show a significant gap between the three economic zones in terms of CO 2 emission intensity, as the Eastern‐Coastal zone possesses more advanced production technologies compared to the Central and Western zones. The most polluting sectors and largest companies are state‐owned enterprises and thus are potentially able to speed up knowledge transfer between companies and regions. The “greening” of the more developed areas is not only a result of superior technology, but also of externalizing production and pollution to the poorer regions in China. The results also show that urbanization and associated income and lifestyle changes were important driving forces for the growth of CO 2 emissions in most regions in China. Therefore, focusing on technology and efficiency alone is not sufficient to curb regional CO 2 emissions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
System Boundary Selection in Life-Cycle Inventories Using Hybrid Approaches
Suh, S., Lenzen, M., Treloar, G. J., Hondo, H., Horvath, A., Huppes, G., Jolliet, O., Klann, U., Krewitt, W., Moriguchi, Y., et al. (2004) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0263745 · Cited by 1,025
Cited by
Challenges and opportunities for carbon neutrality in China
Liu, Z., Deng, Z., He, G., Wang, H., Zhang, X., Lin, J., Qi, Y., & Liang, X. (2021) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-021-00244-x · Cited by 1,748
Drivers of the US CO2 emissions 1997–2013
Feng, K., Davis, S. J., Sun, L., & Hubacek, K. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8714 · Cited by 422
Self-citationThe socioeconomic drivers of China’s primary PM 2.5 emissions
Guan, D., Su, X., Zhang, Q., Peters, G. P., Liu, Z., Lei, Y., & He, K. (2014) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/024010 · Cited by 398
Self-citationTargeted opportunities to address the climate–trade dilemma in China
Liu, Z., Davis, S. J., Feng, K., Hubacek, K., Liang, S., Anadon, L. D., Chen, B., Liu, J., Yan, J., & Guan, D. (2016) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2800 · Cited by 289
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Feng, K., Siu, Y. L., Guan, D., & Hubacek, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Ecology
- Published
- 2012-06-27
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 600-611
- ISSN
- 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9290
- OpenAlex
- W1495609266
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analyzing Drivers of Regional Carbon Dioxide Emissions for China: A Structural Decomposition Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00494.x
- The paper
- Feng, K., Siu, Y. L., Guan, D., & Hubacek, K. (2012). Analyzing Drivers of Regional Carbon Dioxide Emissions for China: A Structural Decomposition Analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00494.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.