The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Falls and Injuries in Frail and Vigorous Community Elderly Persons
Abstract
Identification of different types of falls and fallers among elderly persons might aid in the targeting of preventive efforts. In a representative sample of 336 community elderly, subjects were assigned to Frail, Vigorous, or Transition groups based on observed patterns of clustering among demographic, physical, and psychological variables. The frequency and circumstances of falls in these three groups were then ascertained. As expected, the observed incidence of falling in one year of follow‐up was highest in the Frail group (52%) and lowest in the Vigorous group (17%). However, 22% (5/23) of falls by vigorous subjects, but only 6% (5/89) of falls by frail subjects, resulted in a serious injury. Compared with frail subjects, vigorous fallers were somewhat more likely to fall during displacing activity (53% vs 31%), with an environmental hazard present (53% vs 29%), and on stairs (27% vs 6%). These findings suggest that fall‐related injuries can be a serious health problem for vigorous as well as frail elderly persons. Injury prevention, therefore, should be directed at all elderly persons but tailored to expected differences in fall circumstances .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
Cited by
Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype
Fried, L. P., Tangen, C. M., Walston, J., Newman, A. B., Hirsch, C., Gottdiener, J., Seeman, T., Tracy, R., Kop, W. J., Burke, G., et al. (2001) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146 · Cited by 24,907
Frailty in older adults: a nationally representative profile in the United States
Bandeen-Roche, K., Seplaki, C. L., Huang, J., Buta, B., Kalyani, R. R., Varadhan, R., Xue, Q.-L., Walston, J. D., & Kasper, J. D. (2015) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/glv133 · Cited by 800
Talbot, L. A., Musiol, R. J., Witham, E. K., & Metter, E. J. (2005) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-5-86 · Cited by 654
The effectiveness of exercise interventions for the management of frailty: a systematic review
Theou, O., Stathokostas, L., Roland, K. P., Jakobi, J. M., Patterson, C., Vandervoort, A. A., & Jones, G. R. (2011) · Journal of Aging Research · doi:10.4061/2011/569194 · Cited by 652
Binder, E. F., Schechtman, K. B., Ehsani, A. A., Steger‐May, K., Brown, M., Sinacore, D. R., Yarasheski, K. E., & Holloszy, J. O. (2002) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50601.x · Cited by 549
Metadata
- Authors
- Speechley, M., & Tinetti, M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 46-52
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W1987652063
- Cited by
- 585
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.