The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of a Measure of Physical Illness Burden at Autopsy: The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale
Abstract
Objective: To further validate an objective measure of physical illness burden, the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS). Design: Survey with correlation of CIRS ratings made from physician interviews and review of medical records with postmortem ratings made independently at tissue autopsy. Subjects: Victims of completed suicide investigated by both psychological and tissue autopsy ( n = 72). Results: CIRS ratings made by examination of tissue at autopsy were highly predictive of analogous ratings based on historical data, accounting for 75% of the variance in CIRS scores. Taking autopsy findings as the gold standard of objective health assessment, historical ratings tend to underestimate physical illness at high levels of tissue pathology and to overestimate burden at lower levels. Conclusions: The CIRS score, when derived from all available sources of medical information, is a valid objective measure of physical illness burden and has broad applicability to research in geriatrics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miller, M. D., Paradis, C. F., Houck, P. R., Mazumdar, S., Stack, J. A., Rifai, A. H., Mulsant, B., & Reynolds, C. F. (1992) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/0165-1781(92)90005-n · Cited by 1,990
Neuroticism, Somatic Complaints, and Disease: Is the Bark Worse than the Bite?
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1987) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00438.x · Cited by 1,010
Cited by
A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people
Rockwood, K. (2005) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.050051 · Cited by 8,968
How to measure comorbiditya critical review of available methods
DEGROOT, V, BECKERMAN, H., LANKHORST, G., & BOUTER, L. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00585-1 · Cited by 1,757
Comorbidity and functional status are independent in older cancer patients.
Extermann, M., Overcash, J., Lyman, G. H., Parr, J., & Balducci, L. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1998.16.4.1582 · Cited by 984
Management of Cancer in the Older Person: A Practical Approach
Balducci, L., & Extermann, M. (2000) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.5-3-224 · Cited by 939
Religiosity and remission of depression in medically ill older patients
Koenig, H. G., George, L. K., & Peterson, B. L. (1998) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.155.4.536 · Cited by 658
Metadata
- Authors
- Conwell, Y., Forbes, N. T., Cox, C., & Caine, E. D.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-41
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W1993166557
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of a Measure of Physical Illness Burden at Autopsy: The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb05945.x
- The paper
- Conwell, Y., Forbes, N. T., Cox, C., & Caine, E. D. (1993). Validation of a Measure of Physical Illness Burden at Autopsy: The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb05945.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.