Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Static and Dynamic Posturography in Young and Older Normal People

Baloh, Robert W., Fife, Terry D., Zwerling, Lisa, Socotch, Tina, Jacobson, Kathleen, Bell, Theodore, Beykirch, Karl·1994·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

Objective: To measure sway velocity during static and dynamic posturography in “normal’ older people and to determine which tests best distinguish young from older subjects. Subjects: A sample of 30 young (18–39 years) and 82 community‐dwelling older (>75 years) subjects who reported normal balance underwent a battery of balance tests. Measurements: Velocity and frequency of sway, Tinetti gait and balance score, self‐reported fear of falling and number of falls. Results: Mean sway velocity and the ratio of high to low frequency sway velocity were significantly increased in older subjects compared with younger subjects for static and dynamic tests with eyes open and with eyes closed. Measures of anterior‐posterior sway velocity during angular tilt of the platform with eyes closed best distinguished young from older subjects (almost three‐fourths of older subjects had values greater than 2 standard deviations from the young normal mean). Older subjects who reported falls in the past year did not have a significantly higher sway velocity on static or dynamic tests compared with those who did not report falls. However, subjects who reported a fear of falling had significantly higher sway velocity on dynamic tests with eyes closed compared to those who did not report a fear of falling. Conclusions: On average, velocity of sway is higher in older subjects compared with younger subjects, and the difference between young and old is greater with dynamic posturography than with static posturography.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb07489.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Baloh, R. W., Fife, T. D., Zwerling, L., Socotch, T., Jacobson, K., Bell, T., & Beykirch, K.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-04
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
405-412
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2156014198
Cited by
284
References
31
FWCI
18.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Static and Dynamic Posturography in Young and Older Normal People. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb07489.x
The paper
Baloh, R. W., Fife, T. D., Zwerling, L., Socotch, T., Jacobson, K., Bell, T., & Beykirch, K. (1994). Comparison of Static and Dynamic Posturography in Young and Older Normal People. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb07489.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.