The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effects of the Presence of a Third Person on the Physician‐Older Patient Medical Interview
Abstract
Objective: To compare communication in triadic (three‐person) and dyadic (two‐person) older patient medical interviews and to determine the influence of the presence of a third person on the physician‐older patient relationship. Design: Matched sample of dyadic and triadic audiotaped outpatient medical visits. Audiotapes were coded with the Multi‐dimensional Interaction Analysis (MDIA) system. Setting: Hospital‐based medical primary care group practice in a major urban teaching institution. Participants: Patients 60 years and older who were making their first visit to study physicians. In a sample of 96 audiotaped initial medical visits, 15 encounters involved three persons. These 15 cases were matched with 15 dyadic interviews for gender and race of the patient and for gender and race of the physician. Main Outcome Measures: Content, interactional processes, and specific language and communication behaviors of older patients, physicians, and third persons in the medical encounter, as measured by the MDIA system. Results: The specific content and the quality of interactional processes of physicians were not affected by the presence of a third person. However, older patients raised fewer topics in all content areas (medical, personal habits, psychosocial, and physician‐patient relationship) in triads than in dyads. Overall, patients were less responsive (ie, the quality of their questioning, informing, and supportiveness was poorer) on patient‐raised topics in triads than in dyads. Patients were rated as less assertive and expressive, and there was less joint decision‐making and shared laughter in triads than in dyads. Patients were frequently excluded from conversations in visits in which a third person was present. Conclusions: The presence of a third person in the medical encounter changes the interactional dynamics of older patient medical interviews and may influence the development of a trusting and effective physician‐older patient relationship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“MVCs may have a negative impact if they serve to decrease patient responsiveness to questioning or prevent topics from being raised by the patient [11, 12].”
From Non-spouse companions accompanying older adults to medical visits: a qualitative analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Rosow I., 1981, Elderly Patients and their Doctors
- 10.1093/geront/27.6.729 · DOI
- Coe RM, 1985, Research note: The formation of coalitions: Interaction strategies in triads, Soc Health Ill, 7, 237
- 10.1207/s15327027hc0101_7 · DOI · Paper page
- Hasselkus BR., 1992, Physician and family caregiver in the medical setting: Negotiation of care, J Aging Health, 6, 67
- 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90073-L · DOI
- 10.1016/0271-5309(86)90010-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/geront/27.2.164 · DOI
- 10.1093/geront/29.6.808 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02602324 · DOI · Paper page
- Bertakis KD, 1991, The relationship of physician medical interview style to patient satisfaction, J Fam Pract, 32, 175
- 10.1177/0164027587009001001 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1984.tb06138.x · DOI
Cited by
Caregiver Burden: A Clinical Review
Adelman, R. D., Tmanova, L. L., Delgado, D., Dion, S., & Lachs, M. S. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.304 · Cited by 2,002
Self-citationNon-spouse companions accompanying older adults to medical visits: a qualitative analysis
Sheehan, O. C., Graham-Phillips, A. L., Wilson, J. D., Crews, D. C., Holt, C. L., Gabbard, J., Smith, K. C., Wolff, J. L., & Roth, D. L. (2019) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1098-y · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Greene, M. G., Majerovitz, S. D., Adelman, R. D., & Rizzo, C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 413-419
- ISSN
- 0002-8614
- 1532-5415
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of the Presence of a Third Person on the Physician‐Older Patient Medical Interview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb07490.x
- The paper
- Greene, M. G., Majerovitz, S. D., Adelman, R. D., & Rizzo, C. (1994). The Effects of the Presence of a Third Person on the Physician‐Older Patient Medical Interview. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb07490.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.