Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 469

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of a 12‐Month Exercise Trial on Balance, Strength, and Falls in Older Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Lord, Stephen R., Ward, John A., Williams, Philippa, Strudwick, Maureen·1995·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
DOI 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb07394.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a 12‐month program of regular exercise can improve balance, reaction time, neuromuscular control, and muscle strength and reduce the rate of falling in older women. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial of 12 months duration. SETTING: Conducted as part of the Randwick Falls and Fractures Study in Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ninety‐seven women aged 60 to 85 years (mean age 71.6, SD = 5.4) who were randomly recruited from the community. OUTCOME MEASURES: Accidental falls, postural sway, reaction time, neuromuscular control, and lower limb muscle strength. MAIN RESULTS: Exercise and control subjects were tested before, midway through, and at the end of the trial. At initial testing, exercisers and controls performed similarly in all tests and were well matched in relevant health and lifestyle factors. The mean number of classes attended for the 75 exercise subjects who completed the program was 60.0 (range 26–82). At the end of the trial, the exercise subjects showed improved performance in all five strength measures, in reaction time, neuromuscular control, body sway on a firm surface with the eyes open, and body sway on a compliant surface with the eyes open and closed. In contrast, there were no significant improvements in any of the test measures in the controls. In one test measure, hip flexion strength, the exercisers showed continued improvement throughout the study year. There was no significant difference in the proportion of fallers between the exercise and control subjects. Interesting trends were evident, however, between falls frequency and adherence to the exercise program. CONCLUSIONS: These findings show that exercise can produce long‐term benefits with regard to improving sensorimotor function in older persons. The findings also suggest that high compliance to an exercise program may reduce falls frequency, although further studies are required to conclusively demonstrate that exercise offers an effective means of preventing falls.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb07394.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lord, S. R., Ward, J. A., Williams, P., & Strudwick, M.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-11
Volume
43
Issue
11
Pages
1198-1206
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
DOI
10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb07394.x
OpenAlex
W2004373854
Cited by
469
References
1
FWCI
37.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.