Cited by 161Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesHospital Admissions and OutcomesHealthcare Quality and Management

Effect of the National Resident Assessment Instrument on Selected Health Conditions and Problems

Open access
Fries, Brant E., Hawes, Catherine, Morris, John N., Phillips, Charles D., Mor, Vince, Park, Pil S.·1997·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the implementation of the National Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) system on selected conditions representing outcomes for nursing home residents. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental, pre-/post-design, with assessments at baseline and 6-month follow-up. SAMPLE: Two thousand one hundred twenty-eight residents from 268 nursing homes in 10 states before RAI implementation, and 2,088 from 254 of the same nursing homes after implementation. MEASURES: From the full RAI Minimum Data Set, measures of dehydration, falls, decubitus, vision problems, stasis ulcer, pain, dental status (poor teeth), and malnutrition were examined at baseline and 6 months later. Poor nutrition was evaluated using a body mass index score below 20 and vision using a 4-level scale; other conditions were represented by their presence or absence. Decline and improvement were computed as the changes in level between baseline and follow-up, limiting the sample to those who could manifest each such change. MAIN RESULTS: Of eight health conditions representing poorer health status, dehydration and stasis ulcer had significantly lower prevalence after the implementation of the RAI (1993) compared with 1990. At the same time, there was an increase in the prevalence of daily pain. Fewer residents declined over 6 months in nutrition and vision after implementation. Although for these two conditions there were also significantly reduced rates of improvement, the net was an overall reduction in the 6-month rate of decline for all residents. Pain also demonstrated a decline in the postimplementation rate of improvement. The combined eight conditions showed reductions in the rates of both decline and improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Several outcomes for nursing home residents improved after implementation of the RAI. Of the four conditions for which there are significant declines in prevalence or outcome changes, three are specifically addressed in the care planning guidelines incorporated the RAI system (all except stasis ulcer, although there is a RAP for decubitus ulcer). Pain, the only other condition with a significant result --an increase in baseline prevalence--also has no RAP. Although the changes might be ascribed otherwise, they support the premise that the RAI has directly contributed to improved outcomes for nursing home residents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb02972.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The introduction of the US Resident Assessment Instrument (which requires mandatory monitoring and reporting of hydration risks) reduced dehydration in older adults.

    “It was also suggested that the introduction of the US Resident Assessment Instrument (which requires mandatory monitoring and reporting of hydration risks) reduced dehydration in older adults(220, 261).”

    From ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics (2022) · cites this paper as [261]

    The Results and Discussion report that dehydration prevalence fell after RAI implementation among US nursing-home residents, and the authors suggest the RAI contributed while acknowledging other possible causes. The paper describes required resident assessments and guidelines for identifying dehydration risks, but does not establish a requirement to report those risks; its findings also concern nursing-home residents, not older adults generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Morris JN, Hawes C, Fries BE et al. Designing the National Resident Assess- ment Instrument for Nursing Facilities. Gerontologist 1990;30:293-307.
  2. Morris JN, Hawes C, Murphy K et al. LongTerm Care Resident Assessment Instrument Training Manual. Natick, MA: Eliot Press, 1991.
  3. Phillips CD, Morris JN, Hawes C et al. Association of the Resident Assess- ment Instrument (RAI) with changes in function, cognition, and psychosocial status. J Am Geriatr SOC, 1997;45:986-993.
  4. Lavizzo-Mowrey R, Johnson J, Stolley P. Risk factors for dehydration among elderly nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr SOC 1988;36:213-218.
  5. Tinetti ME, Speechley M. Prevention of falls among the elderly. N Engl J Med 1989;320:1055-1059.
  6. Tinetti ME, Speechley M, Ginter SF. Risk factors for falls among elderly per- sons living in the community. N Engl J Med 1988;319:1701-1707,
  7. Spoelhof GD, Ide K. Pressure ulcers in nursing home patients. Am Fam Phys 1993;47:1207-1215.
  8. Horowitz A. Vision impairment and functional disability among nursing home residents. Gerontologist 1994;34:3 16-323.
  9. Marx MS, Werner P, Cohen-Mansfield J et al. The relationship between low vision and performance of activities of daily living in nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr SOC 1992;40:1018-1020.
  10. Goldman MP, Fronek A, eds. The Alexander House Group. Consensus pa- per on venous leg ulcer. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1992;18:592-602.
  11. Ferrell BA, Ferrell BR, Osterweil D. Pain in the nursing home. J Am Ceriatr Weyant RJ, Jones JA, Hobhins M et al. Oral health status of a long-term- care, veteran population. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993;21:227- 233. 1990;264:2905-2909. SOC 1990;38:409-414.
  12. RAI EFFECTS O N SELECTED HEALTH CONDITIONS 100 1 _ _ _ -~~~_ _ _ _ JAGS AUGUST 1997-VOL. 45, NO. 8 ~- 14. Strayer MS, lbrahim MF. Dental treatment needs of homebound and nursing
  13. Mor V, lntrator 0, Hiris J et al. Impact of the MDS on changes in nursing home patients. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1991;19:176-177. 1993;41:1212-1218. home discharge rates and destinations. J Am Geriatr SOC 1997;45:1002-1010.
  14. Chumlea W, Roche AF, and Mukherjee D. Some anthropometric indices of body composition for elderly adults. J Gerontol 1986;41:36-39.
  15. Andres R, Elahi D, Tobin JD et al. Impact of age on weight goals. Ann Int Med 1985;103:1030-1033.
  16. Hawes C, Morris JN, Phillips CD et al. Reliability estimates for the Mini- mum Data Set for Nursing Home Resident Assessment and Care Screening (MDS). Gerontologist 1995;35:172-178. Gerontol Med Sci 1994;49:M174-182.
  17. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state." A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychi- atr Res 1975;12:189-198.
  18. Fries BE, Schneider D, Foley WJ et al. Refining a case-mix measure for nurs- ing homes: Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-111). Med Care 1994;32:668- 685. Survey Data Analysis Software, Version 6.34. Research Triangle Park, NC: Rcsearch Triangle Institute, 1993. SAS Procedure Guide. Version 6, 3rd Ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc., 1990.
  19. Hawes C, Mor V, Philips CD et al. The ORRA-X7 nursing home regulations and implementation of the Resident Assessment Instrument: effects on pro- cess quality. J Am Ceriatr Soc, 1997;45:977-985. Committee on Nursing Home Regulation. Improving the Quality of Care in Nursing Homes. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 1986.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fries, B. E., Hawes, C., Morris, J. N., Phillips, C. D., Mor, V., & Park, P. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • RTI International (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Fries, Brant E.
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-08
Volume
45
Issue
8
Pages
994-1001
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W2077999912
Cited by
161
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
26.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
nursing home residents, Minimum Data Set, health status outcomes, dehydration, falls, pressure ulcers, venous leg ulcers, pain, malnutrition, visual impairment, dental status, body mass index, nursing home quality of care
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Pressure Ulcer, Dehydration, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health, Health Status, Humans, Male, Nursing Homes, Nutrition Disorders, Pain, Patient Care Planning, Tooth Diseases, United States, Varicose Ulcer, Vision Disorders, Cohort Studies, Geriatric Assessment, Body Mass Index, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review