The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual Impairment and Falls in Older Adults: The Blue Mountains Eye Study
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between visual impairment and falls in older people. DESIGN: Cross‐sectional survey of eye disease with retrospective collection of falls data. SETTING: Two postcode areas in the Blue Mountains west of Sydney, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: All people 49 years of age and older were invited to participate, 3654 (82.4%) of 4433 eligible residents took part, and 3299 answered questions about falls. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects had a detailed eye examination and answered questions about health and vision status, use of medication, and number of falls in the previous 12 months. RESULTS: Tests of visual function that had a statistically significant association with two or more falls after adjustment for confounders were visual acuity (prevalence ratio (PR) 1.9 for visual acuity worse than 20/30), contrast sensitivity (PR 1.2 for a 1‐unit decrease at 6 cycles per degree), and suprathreshold visual field screening (PR 1.5 for 5 or more points missing). However, only visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were significantly associated with two or more falls per 1 standard deviation decrease. The presence of posterior subcapsular cataract (PR 2.1) and use of nonmiotic glaucoma medication (PR 2.0) had a statistically significant association with two or more falls; presence of age‐related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and cortical or nuclear cataract did not. CONCLUSION: Visual impairment is strongly associated with two or more falls in older adults. In addition to poor visual acuity, visual factors such as reduced visual field, impaired contrast sensitivity, and the presence of cataract may explain this association.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk Factors for Hip Fracture in White Women
Cummings, S. R., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W. S., Stone, K., Fox, K. M., Ensrud, K. E., Cauley, J., Black, D., & Vogt, T. M. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199503233321202 · Cited by 3,595
Cited by
Guideline for the Prevention of Falls in Older Persons
Society, A. G., Society, G., Of, A. A., & On Falls Prevention, O. S. P. (2001) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49115.x · Cited by 2,242
Zhang, X., Cotch, M. F., Ryskulova, A., Primo, S. A., Nair, P., Chou, C.-F., Geiss, L. S., Barker, L. E., Elliott, A. F., Crews, J. E., et al. (2012) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.08.045 · Cited by 277
Visual loss and falls: a review
Dhital, A., Pey, T., & Stanford, M. R. (2010) · Eye · doi:10.1038/eye.2010.60 · Cited by 193
Predictors of anti-VEGF treatment response in neovascular age-related macular degeneration
Finger, R. P., Wickremasinghe, S. S., Baird, P. N., & Guymer, R. H. (2014) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2013.03.009 · Cited by 144
Cruess, A. F., Zlateva, G., Xu, X., Soubrane, G., Pauleikhoff, D., Lotery, A., Mones, J., Buggage, R., Schaefer, C., Knight, T., et al. (2008) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.2165/00019053-200826010-00006 · Cited by 126
Metadata
- Authors
- BOptom, R. Q. I., Cumming, R. G., Mitchell, P., & Attebo, K.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 58-64
- ISSN
- 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5415
- OpenAlex
- W2006646315
- Cited by
- 734
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 40.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.